Literature and Notes. 189 



Therapie, XIV. For more recent works on leprosy, by Unna and others, 

 see in Baumgarten's Jahresbericht, and also for discussions on the Bacillus 

 of Syphilis. 



68. Mittheil. d. Reichsgesundheitsamls, I. 



69. Bollinger in Ziemssen's Handb. III. — IxifHer u. Schiitz in Deutsche 

 med. Wochenschrift, 1882, p. 707. — O. Israel in Berliner klin. Wochenschr., 

 1883, p. 155. — Kitt in Jahresber. d. k. Thierarzneischule Miinchen, Leipzig, 

 1885. 



70. Bollinger n. Feser in Deutsche Zeitschr. f. Thiermedicin, 1878-1879. 

 — T. Ehlers, Unters. ii. d. Rauschbrandpilz ; Dissert. Rostock, 1884. — Kitt 

 in Jahresber. d. k. Thierarzneischule Miinchen, Leipzig, 1885. 



71. E. Klein in Virchow's Archiv, XCV (1884), p. 468.— For Loffler, 

 Lydtin, Schottelius, and Schiitz, see Baumgarten's Jahresbericht, 1884, p. loi. 



72. Klebs uud Tommasi Crudeli, Studien ii. d. Ursache d. Wechselfiebers 

 u. ii. d. Natur d. Malaria, in Archiv f. experim. Pathol. XI. — Cuboni u. 

 Marchiafava in Archiv f. experim. Pathol. XIII. — Ceci in Archiv f. 

 experim. Pathologic, XV and XVI. — Ziehl in Deutsche med. Wochen- 

 schrift, 1882, p. 647. — Marchiafava u. Celii, N. Unters. u. d. Malaria- 

 Infection, &c., 1885. — See Baumgarten's Jahresbericht, 1885, p. 153. I knowr 

 these authors only from this report. Laverans' book, cited in it, I do not 

 know. A criticism of the statements of the Italian observers, as they lie 

 before me, would be out of place here ; I would only counsel them to study 

 attentively the zoologico-botanical literature of that portion of natural 

 history with which their writings are occupied, before they deal with it so 

 independently, and employ terms like ' plasmodium,' for the word is 

 applied with the utmost precision to >i portion of developmental history 

 which the authors have never observed in the cases which they are dis- 

 cussing. 



73. Gaffky, Zur Aetiologie d. Abdominaltyphus, in Mitth. aus d. k. 

 Reichsgesundheitsamt, II, 372, where the literature is given at length. 



74. Fr. LbfHer, Unters. ii. d. Bedeutung d. Mikroorganismen fur d. Ent- 

 stehung d. Diphtheric beim Menschen, bei d. Taube u. beim Kalbe in Mitth. 

 aus d. k. Reichsgesundheitsamt, II, p. 421. 



76. J. M. Klob, Pathol, anatom. Studien ii. d. Wesen d. Choleraprocesses, 

 Leipzig, 1867. — R. Koch in Berliner klin. Wochenschrift, 1884, Nos. 31- 

 32 a ; — Id. in Verhandl. d. zweiten Conferenz z. Erorterung d. Cholerafragen in 

 Berlin, klin. Wochenschrift, 1885, No. 37 a. — E. van Ermengem, Recherches 

 sur le Microbe du Cholera Asiatique, Paris et Bruxelles, 1885. — F. Hueppe, 

 Ueber d. Dauerformen d. sogen. Kommabacillen, in Fortschritt d. Medicin, 

 III, 1885, No. 19, and in Deutsche med. Wochenschrift, 1885, No. 44. — 

 For Nicati u. Rietsch, Doyen, Watson Cheyne, Babes, and others, see the 

 citations in Baumgarten's Jahresbericht, 1885. — Finkler u. Prior in Tagebl. 

 d. sieben u. funfzigsteu Ver. Deutsch. Naturf u. Aerzte z. Magdebourg, 

 p. 2 16 ; — Id., Forschnngen ii. Cholerabacterien im Erganzungsheft z. Central- 

 blatt f. allg. Gesundheitspflege, I. — Emmerich, Vortr. im Aerztl. Ver. z. 



