TABLE OF CASES CITED 
Adams, (¢2. rel.) v. Burdge, 
95 Wis. 390, 70 N. W. 347, 
Of De Ry, Ay UG esexs cams 149 
Adams vy. Milwaukee, 144 
Wis. 371, 129 N. W. 518. 
Spies 11, 154, 169, 171, 173 
Adams v. Milwaukee, 228 U. 
S. 572..11, 154, 169, 171, 173 
Adams (Adms.) v. Stewart, 
Dear. 1A iaied one austere ean 93 
Aiton v. Board of Medical 
Examiners, 13 Ariz. 354, 
WIA PAC. 9625 eee aca siece eaiovn 60 
Allen v. Allen, 2 P. & W. 
166 
Allen v. Ham, 63 Me. 532 
ee eae 105, 285 
Allen v. State, 42 Tex. 517.252 
Allison v. Cash, 143 Ky. 679, 
137 S. W. 245, 21 Cyc. 405. 
ere eee 148, 151 
Almond v. Nugent, 34 Iowa, 
300, 11 Am. R. 147...... 76 
Allopathic State Board of 
Med. Exrs. v. Fowler, 50 
La. Ann. 1358, 24 So. 809 52 
American Preservers’ Co. v. 
Drescher, 4 Mise. (N. Y.) 
482, 24 N. Y. S. 361..... 278 
Angus Cattle Co. v. McLeod, 
(Neb.) 152 N. W. 322...261 
Anson v. Dwight, 18 Iowa, 
O41. ce ecs eee er reed 98, 233 
Apothecaries’ Co. v. Bentley, 
16..& Pi 638805 sen esau 93 
Arbuckle v. Pflaeging, 20 
Wy. 351, 123 Pac. 918...143 
Arkansas Val. L. ete. Co. v. 
Mann, 130 U.S. 69...... 247 
Armour & Co. v. Augusta, 
134 Ga. 178, 67 S. E. 417.199 
Asheville v. Nettles, 164 N. 
C. 315, 80 S. E. 236..... 168 
Atterberry v. State, 19 Tex. 
App. 401 
Attorney General v. Birming- 
ham, Tame & Rea D. Dist. 
L. R. C. D. (1910) 1 Ch. 
AS" 5 iyid-d wed hes wee ba apes 38 
Attorney General v. Chur- 
ehill’s Veterinary Sanato- 
rium, Ltd., 79 L. J. Ch. 
714, (1910) 2 Ch. 401... 67 
Attorney General v. Myddle- 
ton’s Ltd. (1907) 1 J. R. 
AT Ls) Renesas Bie Hassipcenae cu 67 
Atzroth v. State, 10 Fla. 207.253 
Aubuchon v. Pohlman, 1 Mo. 
App. 298 seciwecnina ve an 258 
August Brandt & Co. v. Ver- 
hagen, (Wis.) 152 N. W. 
BAG ihe n d Sem hae RO YER S 248 
Auld v. Travis, 5 Co. App. 
535, 39 Pac, 357......... 283 
Austin v. Miller, 74 N. C. 
DTA stone a brece WaaG eater es 278 
Bacon v. Walker, 204 U. S. 
OD rescd aldiaanat eoanasiede Ben aeencee. 25 
Bailey v. Davis, 19 Ore. 217, ~ 
23 Pac. 881 ............ 284 
291 
