298 
Harris v. Woodruff, 
Mass: 205 <1 sesxevad< sss 285 
Hart v. Vidal, 6 Cal. 56....117 
Hathorn v. Richmond, 48 Vt. 
557 
190 
Al) ass caietis auusem tte a arse 273 
Hawkins v. Hoye, (Miss.) 
66 So. T4dw sc aecs sas 11, 171 
Heath v. Glison, 3 Ore. 64.. 76 
Heisrodt v. Hackett, 34 Mich. 
283, 22 Am. 8. Rep. 529 
spite aoa a tnvate take bon 98, 233 
Helland v. Bridenstine, 55 
Wash. 470, 104 Pac. 626.. 85 
Henderson & Campbell v. 
Hall & Hughes, 87 Ark. 1, 
112) S.. W. AT is cence 103 
Hensel v. Noble, 95 Pa. 345 
shidteleagaapina gered s eatcs 281, 282 
Herber v. State, 7 Tex. 69. .252 
Herndon v. City of Spring- 
field, 137 Mo. App. 513, 
119 S. W. 467........... 102 
Herrick v. Gary, 65 Ill. 101.152 
Herrick v. Gary, 83 Tl. 85.260 
Hewett v. Board of Medical 
Examiners, 148 Cal. 590, 
84 Pac: 89 seas see ees 59 
Hewett v. Woman’s Hospit- 
al Aid Assn., 73 N. H. 
556, 64 Atl. 190, 7 L. BR. 
A. (N. 8.) 496......... 84 
Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 
MASS 286s scets contin peas 88 
Hickman y. McMorris, 149 
Ky. 1, 147 8. W. 768. .16, 139 
Hickman v. Thomas, 16 Ala. 
666 
TABLE OF CASES CITED 
Highland v. Schulte, 123 
Mich. 360, 82 N. W. 62..139 
Hill v. Ball, 2 H. & N. 298.239 
Hillyard v. Grand Trunk Ry. 
Co. 8 Ont. 583.......... 266 
Hine v. New Haven, 40 Conn. 
ATS  ibie's saitisie ce nine seed 27 
Hitchcock v. Burgett, 38 
Mich: 501 cscs ss acces 80, 88 
Hoag v. Orange Mt. Lnd. 
Co, 12 N. J. L. Jour. 
B43. Gaiwieiseaa sess a peace 5h 265 
701 
690 
492 
Hooker v. McAllister, 12 
Wash. 46, 40 Pac. 617...284 
Hoover v. Epler, 52 Pa. 522 
set itnawin rteatsatteae 104, 284 
Hostler, The, In re, Yelv. 
OT ssawrmcaws sa mews cvae 283 
Houska v. Hrabe, 8. Dak. 
151 N. W. 1021......... 261 
Houston v. State, 13 Tex. 
App. 595 
Howard v. Babeock, 21 IIl. 
259 
Howard Com. Co. v. Nation- 
al L. 8S. Bank, 93 Tll, App. 
473 
Howell v. Smith, 108 Mich. 
350, 66 N. W. 218...... 117 
Hoyt v. McLoughlin, 250 Til. 
442,95 N. E. 464........ 37 
Hubbard v. Allyn, 200 Mass. 
166, 86 N. E. 356........ 132 
Hull v. Hull, 48 Conn. 250, 
40 Am, R. 165.......... 249 
Humphrey v. Dunnells, 21 
Cal. App. 312, 131 Pae. 
761 
