A HISTORY OF LANCASHIRE 



through many hands, and the hall is now part of a 

 boys' industrial ch<«j', managed by the Brothers of 

 Charity." Coclccrsand Abbey had land in Tulketh." 

 The Hospitallers had some in Ashton. 54 



Of ISGOL there is little to be said." Land was 

 given to the endowment of St. Mary Magdalene's 

 Ho-ptal by Walter son of Gamel de Ingol about 

 1200. 56 Richard de Lea gave to Edmund Earl of 

 Lancaster lands in In?ol in Christ's Croft, White- 

 field, &c., ; ' 7 and William son of William de Ingol 

 gave the earl land in Oldfield.'* In 1567 it was 

 alleged that the queen was sei;eJ of the manor, to 

 which appertained a pasture or moss ground in which 

 all her inhabitants, tenants and farmers in Ingol, had 

 common of pasture and turbary. 59 Fulshaw Moor 

 was in Ashtun and Ingol. " J 



COTT.JM, assessed as 2 oxgang) of land, may be 

 identified with a grant of the land by Kulesyke" made 

 by Arthur de Ashton to Richard son of Uctrcd ; 

 fur this Richard afterwards gave it to Roger hit son 

 under the name Cottam," while Roger son of Richard 

 son of Uctred de Singleton granted an oxgang of land 

 in Cottam to Richard son of Robert son of L'clrcJ.* 3 

 This last grant seems to have been made in 1 204. ** 

 Towards the end of the same century Henry de 

 Haydock was in possession, 84 and gave it to a younger 

 ron Henry,'"' whose descendants continued to hold it 

 till the early part of the 18th century. The early 

 history of the family is obscure. 67 Cuttam in the 

 earlier surveys is stated to be held of the Karl <►! 

 Lancaster by the service of is. 6J. yearly, but at the 

 death of Eleanor Haydock in 1525 the estate in 



266. It appears that in 175O there was 

 a tale or mortgage of Tulketh Hall by 

 Stanley Werdcn of Tulketh Hall and 

 Ashton Wcrden of Accrington, clerk, his 

 •on and heir ; Piccopc MSS. 'Ciet. Lib.), 

 iii, ;6j, from R. 2 ^ of Geo. 1 1 .it Preston. 



Jj Roger ion of William ion of M.istcr 

 Wii: am dc Preston in 1^4 «. claimed 

 t acre* in Tulketh against J"lin <"n of 

 Ellit de Entw tic; Dc lianco R. 256, 

 m. 4 '1. 



- 1 Adam <lc Lea gave the canons 8 acrrt 

 in 'the vill ot Tulcheth,' adjoining ihe 

 l'rr»*on boundary, with all lil.ertict, &c, 

 of the \itl appurtenant ; CocktrianJ 



C .irtul. 1, 21 ;. 



Alice -iji. ■'':'[■ of William son of 

 Arthur [de Ashton 1 in her widowhood 

 t-are land in Tulketh, with a moiety of 

 her wood in Athton ; ibid. From the 

 bounds rrctri it appears that Tulketh 

 touched the Rib' le ; • ■ ti ier [-o.nii named 

 are the six Ashheys, the Foxholegreavc 

 and Ciakerkelde. 



w Robert son of Bernard's gifts to the 

 hospital inc! ded an oxgang in Ashton ; 

 Kuerden MSs. v, fol. 82. 



** The eitent of 1 ^46 merely says that 

 divers tenants had lanis there, paying 

 2 \d. ; Adam de Preston held 30 acres for 

 life at a rent of 4)01.; Add. MS. }2loi|, 

 fol. r 4 S -' . 



In 1246 Avice de In?<>] and her hus- 

 band I'aldwin de Preston held certain 

 lands during the minority of John son of 

 William de Yealand, and Gilbert de 

 Ingol was sued i >• John de la Lea ; Atsirc 

 R. 404, m. 4 I., c, 10. 



Aldred de Ingol gave Adam de ITthton 

 his ;..:! of Sperirt within the b*.u'-..ls of 

 I -.■ : ; Add. MS. ?2i , no. ;S-. Henry 

 Mi- n -urchated a messuage from Thomas 

 IT^iiMii and Anne his wife in t;>is \ 

 Pa!, ot' Ijnc. Feet of F. bdle. 50, m. 64. 

 Robert France of Fulwood in 1632 held 

 land in Ingol as of the manor of Lea of Sir 

 G.lbert Hoghton ; D-chy of Lane. Inq. 

 p.m. xxijc, no. c 1 . 



Leyland of MoKeys held land in Ingol 

 as part of the Broughton estate ; ibid, xi, 

 no. 20. 



* Farrer, Lit.i. Pipe R. 354. The 

 land seems to have been within Ingol, 

 but one plat touched the old Kirkgate (of 

 Preston). The seal of the charter bore 

 the !e«c: *.;g!llv. walteri. dl ingoou' 



57 D-chy of Lane Anct. D. (P.R.O.), 

 L2911; Great Couchcr, i, foL 61, 

 no. 1 1. 



Ibid, ii, fol. 388, no. 5. Leases of 

 land in Ingol by the Dukes of Lancaster 

 are recorded in 130 and later; Dtp. 

 Kttti'i Rtp. xjuii, App. 342 ; ad, A:p. 

 525, 528. 



« Duchy of Lane. Plead. Elic Uxii, 

 H 13. 



A claim by Edward TyMealey to land 

 called Wilcock Acre was investigated in 

 IC.79. Charters by Maud widow ot" 

 'Thomas dc Hutton, Geoffrey de Cottam 

 to John his son, and John Cottam ( 1404) 

 to William Leyland were produced ; 

 Duchy of Lane. Special Com. 279. 



*' Pal. of Lane, l'ic.i R. 20c, m. 4. 

 There is a reference to it in the time of 

 Elualeth (Lamu a-J Che,. R«. [ Rec. 

 Soc', 11, 254, 272), and in 1624-5 l and 

 in Ingol, Fulshaw Moor and Cottam 

 Moss was granted oot by the Crown ; 



Pit. 22 Jat. I, pL xvii. 



81 Two ^i.angs ot land in Ashton, via. 

 the land by Fulesyk'-, and a fourth part 

 of the service of Ingol; Add. MS. 

 32106, no. 383. A rent of bit. was to 

 be paid. 



*- Two oigan.-' of land in Ashton, via. 

 Cottam and the ml by Fulesykc, and a 

 fourth part of the service of Ingol, as 

 ter' r", for which - pair of gloves \v:is to 

 be r u !e ed ; K .<•■ : a MSS iv, C 2£. 



«• Dods. MSS calix, fol. to*. The 

 rent w j* to be half a pound of cummin. 



*• W ilium de Vernon, 'then thcrill,' 

 attested it ; P.R.t). Lilt, 72. 



The tame Roger ton of Richard dc 

 Singleton enfeoffed Heibert the White, 

 who had married Avice daughter of Henry 

 ie Lea, of : lie fourth part of an oxgang of 

 land in Cottam (being the eighth part of 

 the vill of Lotum which Roger held in 

 demesne), and an eighth part of an 

 oxgang in the same place, at a rent of 

 -,r. ; Kuerden, loc. cit. A mill on the 

 Savock and a fishery in the Ribble are 

 named. 



Alice widow of Alan de Singleton in 

 1246 sued Robert the Tailor for dower in 

 half an oxgang of land in Cottam, while 

 Robert claimed turbary against John de 

 ' -a and othert ; Aat^e R. 404, m. 14 A., 

 14- 



- The estate may have been acquired 

 by purchase. Michael son of Herbert 

 (perhaps the Herbert named above) re- 

 leased his lands in Cottam to Henry de 

 Haydock ; Geoffrey son of Richard de 

 Cottam, Robert ton of Robert the Cor- 

 v'ser and Alice daughter of John de 

 Dewsbury granted landa to the tame 

 Henry ; while Adam ton of Alan the 

 Miller granted land to Henry son of 

 Henry de Haydock. See Kuerden, loc. 

 cit. 



u Ibid. ; the date may be about 127-j, 

 For the land in Cottam the yo :n;er Henry 

 was to render zt. 61., for that in In:'.l 

 11. 6 J. and 1 J. for the light of St. Cuthbert 

 of Cli.ton (lie), for that in Athton 7 J. 



134 



In 1284 Henry son of Henry de Hay- 

 dock recovered agninat hit l.ilhcr a mes- 

 suage and 1 oxgang of land in Cottam, 

 14 acres in Ashton and a messuage and 

 ;o acres in Ingul ; Assize R. 1265, m. 

 4 d. In i2<(2 Alice and Aline daughters 

 of John (cider) son of Henry de Haydock 

 claimed messuages and land in Cottam 

 against Henry son of Henry de Haydock 

 and others. The plaintiffs were under age. 

 The jury found th.it Henry the father 

 enfeoffed Henry the son of the tenement 

 in dispute and put him in full seisin. 

 Afterwards his father disseised him, but 

 he recovered the tenements by assize of 

 novel disseisin (viz. the suit above referred 

 to) and demised them t<> his father for a 

 term of five years ; the father, five years 

 before his dc;,th, rendered thrm to Henry 

 his son. There was therefore ■ verdict 

 for Henry j Assize R. 408, m. 20 d. 



Henry son of Henry dc H-.yl'x-k in 

 1295 granted land in Ashton to Richard 

 son of Roger de Ashton ; Kuerden MSS, 

 iv, A 6. 



An inquiry into the character of Richard 

 dc Cott.im, clerk, who had been arrested 

 for the death of William le Paumere, was 

 made in 1293. He proved his innocence 

 and was reported t<> be *<>( honest and 

 good conversation ' j Lanct. Inj. and Ex- 

 tcnti, i, 280. 



07 In 1308-9 William son of Gilbert 

 dc Ashton claimed a tenement in Cottam 

 against Ellen widow of Henry de Hay- 

 dock ; Assize R. 423, m. 2d. Edmund 

 de Haydock succeeded, but his parentage 

 does not appear ; he occurs as attesting 

 deeds, &c, from 1 3 1 7 to 1352. He 

 secured recognition as a partner in the 

 manor of Ashton, as appears by the eitent 

 of 1 346 (note 44 above). Robert son of 

 Robert de Cottam granted a ton to Robert 

 his son, who married Edith daughter of 

 Gilbert de Ashton ; and in 1 317-18 Edusa 

 widow of Robert son of Robert the 

 Corviser released to hdmund de Haydock 

 all right in certain land ; Kuerden MSS. 

 iv, C25. In 1348 Edmund obtained 1 

 licence for his oratory in the manor of 

 Cottam from the Archdeacon of Rich- 

 mond ; ibid. 



Richard de Haydock attested a charter 

 in 1 359 ; Add. MS. 32106, no. 461. 



Sir Richard de Hoghton in 1388 ac- 

 quired land in English Lea from John de 

 Haydock of Cottam and Margaret hii 

 wife ; Final Cone, iii, 32. John de Hay- 

 dock was a burgess at the guilds of 1 397 

 and 141 5 ; Preiton Guild H (Rec Soc 

 Lines, and Ches.), e,, 8. Edmund son of 

 J'.hn de Haydock also appeared in 13971 

 ibid. 3. John wa« living in 1419; Add. 

 MS. 32106, no. 549. 



