322 



SUMMARIES OF THE HISTOLOGIC CHARACTEBS, ETC. 



Summary of Table F. — Recapitulation of the Sum-totals of the Reaction-intensities of the Starches of all of the Hybrids as regards 

 Sameness, Intermediateness, Excess, and Deficit of Development of Different Hybrids in relation to the Parents. 



Hybrids. 



Same as 



seed 

 parent. 



Same ae 

 pollen 

 parent. 



Same as 



both 

 parents. 



Inter- 

 mediate. 



Highest. 



Lowest. 



Brunsdonna sanderoe alba 



Brunsdonna sanderoe 



Hippeastnmi titan-cleonia 



Hippeastrum ossultan-pyrrha . . . 

 Hippeastrmu dseones-zephyr . . . . 



Hsemanthus andromeda 



Hsemanthus konig albert 



Crinimi hybridum j. u. h 



Crinum kircape 



Crinum powellii 



Nerine dainty maid 



Nerine queen of roses 



Nerine giantess 



Nerine abundance 



Nerine glory of sarnia 



Narcissus poetieus herrick 



Narcissus poetieus dante 



Narcissus poetaz triumph 



Narcissus fieiy cross 



Narcissus doubloon 



Narcissus cresset 



Narcissus will scarlet 



Narcissus bicolor apricot 



Narcissus madame de graaS. . . 



Narcissus pyramus 



Narcissus lord roberts 



Narcissus agnes harvey 



Narcissus j. t. bennett poe 



Lilium marhan 



LUium daJhansoni 



Lilium golden gleam 



Lilium testaceum 



Lilium burbanki 



Iris ismali 



Iris dorak 



Iris mrs. alan grey 



Iris pursind 



Gladiolus colvillei 



Tritonia crocosmjeflora 



Begonia mrs. heal 



Begonia ensign 



Begonia Julius 



Begonia success 



Richardia mrs. roosevelt 



Musa hybrida 



PhaiuB hybridus 



Miltonia bleuana 



Cymbidium ebumeo-lowianum . 



Calanthe veitchii 



Calanthe bryan 



Total number of reactions 



Per cent of 1018 reactions 



Per cent of sameness and of intermediateness, highest and lowest 



4 

 6 

 2 

 3 

 

 8 

 15 

 

 4 

 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 3 

 1 

 

 1 

 2 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 1 

 3 

 4 

 2 

 

 4 

 4 

 4 

 2 

 3 

 5 

 

 3 

 7 

 2 

 9 

 

 1 

 2 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 3 

 4 

 2 

 1 



137 

 13.4 





 

 3 

 

 2 

 

 

 12 

 1 

 3 

 2 

 1 

 6 

 3 

 6 

 3 

 4 

 2 

 2 

 1 

 3 

 1 

 1 

 2 

 

 1 

 

 

 5 

 1 

 4 

 3 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 1 

 2 

 

 1 

 

 



1 



3 

 

 3 

 3 

 

 

 1 

 



94 

 9.2 



1 

 1 



8 

 8 

 9 

 6 

 

 

 

 

 7 

 7 

 7 

 7 

 8 

 

 

 1 

 



1 







1 

 1 







1 

 1 

 1 





 9 

 9 

 5 

 2 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 3 

 5 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 

 

 

 4 

 

 5 

 3 

 9 

 

 



5 

 2 

 4 

 3 

 6 



11 

 7 

 5 



18 

 2 

 6 

 3 

 6 

 3 

 1 

 3 

 4 

 

 2 

 4 

 

 2 

 2 

 1 

 2 

 4 

 3 

 

 6 

 9 

 2 

 7 

 6 



12 

 1 

 1 

 6 

 4 



16 



14 

 7 

 4 

 2 

 3 

 2 



11 

 1 

 

 5 



11 



138 

 13.6 



236 

 23.2 



3 

 3 

 5 



11 

 5 

 

 1 

 2 

 2 



21 

 8 



11 

 1 

 1 

 

 2 

 1 



20 

 2 

 

 3 

 4 

 

 1 

 4 

 

 1 

 8 

 1 

 2 

 7 

 6 

 

 1 



11 

 4 

 5 

 

 3 

 

 1 

 4 

 3 

 4 

 

 3 



17 

 

 4 

 1 



187 

 18.4 



13 

 14 



4 



1 



4 



1 



3 



7 



1 







2 



2 



4 



9 

 10 



2* 



0* 



1 



3 



2* 



2* 



0* 



3* 



2* 



2* 



1* 



1* 



0* 



5 



1 



4 



4 

 16 

 16 



4 

 17 



6 

 14 



2 



1 



2* 



0* 



0* 



1* 

 20 



3 



2 

 13 



1* 



0* 



226 

 22.2 



36.2 



63.8 



♦Number of reactions = 10 or 13. 



Keaction-intensities of Bach Hybrid Starch in 



Eelation to Sameness and Inclination to 



Bach Parent and Both Parents. 



(Table G.) 



The data included in Table P, Parts 1 to 50, can be 

 given a settkig that will show quite clearly, although 

 somewhat grossly, the comparative degrees of influence 

 that have been exerted by each of the parents on the 

 properties of the starch of the hybrid. Such a presenta- 

 tion will be found in Table 6. From the figures here 

 formulated it will be seen that the various hybrids ex- 



hibit the widest differences in their parental bearings, 

 there being all gradations between one extreme where 

 with the exception of 3 reactions of 26 there is same- 

 ness or inclination to the seed parent (as in Hwmanthus 

 konig albert and Begonia mrs. heal) and the other ex- 

 treme where with the exception of 1 or 2 reactions of 

 36 the corresponding relationship is borne to the pollen 

 parent (as in Crinum hybridum j. c. h., 0. powellii. 

 Gladiolus colvillei, and Musa hybrida) . In most of the 

 hybrids there is a quite definite leaning to one or the 

 other parent. In summing up the total number of reac- 

 tions in each column it is found that of 1,018 reactions 



