CLASSIFICATION 



The evolution of an adequate classification of the Amphibia 



has been a long process. Even their recognition as a class, 

 separate from, and of equal rank with that of, the Eeptilia, was 

 by no means generally accepted until comparatively recent times. 

 A historical sketch of the laborious, often painful, striving for 

 light, in France and Germany, then in England, and lastly in 

 America, is not without interest. 



The term Amphibia was invented by Linnaeus for the third class of animals 

 in his famous " Systema Natnrae." It comprises a very queer assembly, 

 which, eveii in the 13th edition (1767), stands as follows : — 



1. Reptiles pedati, with the four "genera" Testudo, Draco, Lacerta, 

 and Rana. Lacerta includes Crocodiles, Lizards, and Newts ! 



2. Sbbpbntes apodes. 



3. Nantes pinnati. Elasmobranchs, Sttirgeons, Lampreys, and various 

 other fishes. 



Laiirenti, 1768, in a dissertation entitled "Specimen medicum, exhibens 

 Synopsin Reptilium ," vises Brisson's term, Reptiles, and divides 



them into : — 



Rbptilia salientia, these are the Anura. 

 Gbadiehtia, namely the Urodela and Lizards. 

 Sebpentia, the Snakes and the Apoda, 



Brongniart, 1800, " Essay d'une classification naturelle des Reptiles," ^ dis- 

 tinguishes : — 



Chelonii, Saurii, Ophidii, Batbachii ; the last for the Frogs, Toads, 

 and Newts. 



Latreille, 1804, "Nouveau Diet. Hist. Nat." xxiv.,^ accepts the four Orders of 

 Brongniart's " Reptiles," but clearly separates the fourth Order, 

 " Batrachii," from the rest by the following, now time-honoured, 

 diagnosis : Doigts des pattes n'ayant pas d' angles ; des hranchies, du 

 mcins pendant un temps; des metamorphoses. But there is not on& 

 word about " Amphibia " in opposition to " Reptilia." 



Dumeril, 1806, " Zoologie analytique " (p. 90), and "Elemens de I'histoire 

 naturelle," 1807, divides the "Reptiles batraciens," or " Batracii," into 

 EcAUDATi and Caudati ; he also introduces the terms " Anoubes " 

 and " UBODi;LES " as their equivalents ; bvit since these terms appear in 

 the French form purists do not admit their having any claim to 

 recognition 1 



Oppel, 1811, "Die Ordnungen, Familien und Gattungen der Reptilien,'' 

 establishes the term Apoda for the Coeciliae, and recognises their 

 affinity to the Ecaudata and Oaudata by removing them from the 

 Snakes. 



De Blainville, 1816, "Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution du regne 

 animal " ■* — 

 Amphibiens SQDAMirijBES. [The Reptilia.] 



„ NTTDlPELLlFiiBES .s. Ichthyoides. [The Amphibia.] 



Bull. Sac. PMlom. ii. p. 81. ^ Taileattx mSthodiques,' p. 61. 



3 Bull. Soc. Philom. p. 113. 



