3. ANOLIS. 2] 
Two median series of dorsal scales abruptly 
ONlaTeed is awit as aeqew eg haremnaes os 94. radulinus, p. 86. 
** Head short. 
T Occipital considerably larger than the ear- 
opening. 
Ventral scales large and sharply keeled .... 99. chrysolepis, p.89. 
tt Occipital nearly as large as, or smaller than, 
the ear-opening. 
Dorsal scales very small, slightly larger than 
the laterals; ventrals large and strongly 
ROCA se nes eran bh ches ale val Me eee 100. seypheus, p. 90. 
Dorsal and ventral scales small, feebly keeled 102. leptoscelis, p. 92. 
Scales on the vertebral region nearly as large 
as the ventrals; latter strongly keeled.... 103. lentiginosus, 
[p. 93. 
6. Dorsal scales smooth. 
Occipital larger than the ear-opening ; upper 
head-scales keeled .......... 000000000 101. nitens, p. 91. 
Occipital larger than the ear-opening ; upper [p. 94. 
head-scales smooth................000. 104, bombiceps, 
Occipital minute........ 6.0 c eee ees 105. capito, p. 94. 
1. Anolis equestris. 
Dactyloa equestris, Gray, Cat. p. 198*. 
Sloane, Nat. Hist. Jam. ii. p. 333, pl. 273. fig. 2. 
Anolis equestris, Merr. Tent. p. 45; Dum. § Bibr. iv. p. 157; Coct. 
in R. de la Sagra, Hist. Cuba, Rept. p. 114, pl. ix. 
Anolius rhodolemus, Bell, Zool. Journ. iii, 1828, p. 235, suppl. pl. xx. 
Ctenonotus (Eupristis) equestris, Fitzing. Syst. Rept. p. 64. 
Head very large, once and three fourths as long as broad, much 
longer than the tibia; upper surface slightly concave, covered with 
irregular, rough, bony tubercles, largest on the snout, and especially 
on the canthus rostralis; loreal rows four or five tT; supraocular 
scales very small; occipital indistinct ; squamosal bone forming a 
strong tubercular ridge; eye-opening small; car-opening very 
small; nine or ten upper labials to below the centre of the eye. 
Gular appendage very large, extending posteriorly to beyond the 
thorax, a little smaller in the female; its greater portion perfectly 
naked. Body strongly compressed, with a small dorso-nuchal crest 
* O'Shaughnessy remarks, Ann. & Mag. N. H. (4) xv. p. 271, that “the 
second specimen referred in Dr. Gray’s Catalogue to this species is a Urostro- 
phus vautiert.” As I find in another bottle labelled Urostrophus vautiert a 
specimen of Anolis equestris, it is clear that Gray never committed the error 
which has been attributed to him, but that a confusion of bottles has taken 
Jace. 
: + The loreal rows are counted in a vertical series in front of the orbit. 
