294 ELEMENTS OP OENITHOLOGT. 



Suborder III. TEOCHILJ. 

 Family I. TBOCHiLiD.ffii. 

 1. Subfamily Trochilmae. 

 Group 1. Trochili serrirostres *. 



Heliothrix, 3. Schistes, 2. Augastes, 2. Sham- 

 phodon, 1. Androdon, 1. Hemistephania, 4. GUrucis,2. 

 Chlorostilbon, 13. Sporadinus, 3. lache, 5. Phao- 

 ptila, 1. Aithurus, 1. M!icrnchera, 2. CaUipharus, 1. 

 Panychlora, 7. Evpliei-iisa, 3. Elvira, 2. Thahi- 

 rania, 14. Hypuroptila, 5. Lampornia, 10. Pwa- 

 roksma, 1. ikwoeeite^o, 1. Eulanipis, 2. Pcteo- 

 phora, 7. Chrysolampis, 1. 



Group 2. Trochili intermedii. 



Pterophanes, 1. Seliomaster, 1. Lejndolarynx, 1. 

 DipMogema, 3. Helianthea, 7. Bourderia, 5. 

 Etidosia, 1. Lampropygia, 7. Cyanolesbia, 4. 

 Zodalia, 2. Sappho, 3. Neolesbia, 1. Lesbia, 4. 

 Metallura, 9. Eustephanus, 3. Panterpe, 1. Be/j- 

 angelus, 7. Heliotrypha, 6. Urosticte, 3. Adeto- 

 myia, 4. Anthocephala, 1. PMogopMlus, 1. Polyt- 

 mus, 3. Dolermnyia, 1. ZeucoeUoris, 1. Agyrtria, 22. 

 ./4i7araa, 1. Cyanomyia, 8. Leucippus, 4. Amazilia, 

 30. Flon'eola, 4. Cyanophaia, 3. Damophila, 2. 

 Polyerata, 2. Eucephala, 10. JSylocharu, 3. Cfe-y- 

 «Mrom'o, 6. Basilinna, 2. 



Group 3. TrocMli Isevirostres. 



Eutoxeres, 4. Threneies, 5. Phaethomis, 16. 

 Pygmornis, 8. Sphenoproctiis, 2. Campylopterus, 8. 

 Eupetomena, 2. Aphantochroa, 3. PAcBochroa, 2. 

 Sternoclyta,!. Urochroa,!. Eugenes,2. Cosligena,\. 

 Oreopyra, 4. Delattria, 4. ClytolcBma, 2. Lampro- 

 l<ema,l. Eocimastes, \. Eugenia,!. Seliodoxa, i. 

 lolcsma, 3. Zampraster, 1. Phaoltema, 3. JHj/fo- 

 nympha,!. Zafresnaya,2. Florisiiga, 2. Topciza,2. 

 Oreotrochilus, 6. Oreonympha, 1. Oxypogon, 3. 



* I am indebted to the great kindness of Mr. Osbert SaWn, F.E.S., and 

 of Dr. Qunther, P.E.S., for the use of Mr. Sal^in's Manuscript Catalogue, 

 from which the above names of genera and their division into three groups are 

 taken. These groups are not considered by their author to have the rank of 

 Bubfamilies, the difterences between any of the Trochili not being sufficient 

 for such a subdivision, though the multitudinous genera may be conveniently 

 grouped as Mr. Salvin has suggested, and as is here expressed. 



