624 



AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 



Family Eugnathidae 



Triassic and Jurassic 



Structure and taxonomy. Woodward, 

 A. S. 1889.2. 



Caturus and Osteorachis. Osteology. 

 Woodward, A. S. 1897.2. 



Family Amiidse Camiatidas 



Range, Eocene to present 

 Taxonomy. Hay, O. P. 1898.1. 



Amia {Bow-fin, Grindle). Natural 

 history, occurrence, etc. Bean, T. H. 

 1890.17; Eyrich, G. C. 1877.1; Des- 

 roohers, J. E. 1904.1; Debsohitz, H. 

 1901.2, .5; •Reighard, J. 1904.2; Rob- 

 inson, W. E. 1875.1. — Jn Susquehanna 

 R. Stauffer, J. 1879.1. — Nomenclature, 

 general discussion. Heokel, J. J. 1851.5. 



Fossil species — in Miocene of Germany. 

 Andreae.A. 1893.1,1894.1. —inTertiary, 

 Giebel, 0. G. {France) 1869.1; Marsh, 

 O. 0. {Wyoming) 1871.1. — in Oligocene. 

 Lambe, L. M. {Saskatchewan) 1908.1; 

 Leriohe, M. {I sle. of Wight) 1908.6; New- 

 ton, E. T. {Isle of Wight) 1899.1. —in 

 Eocene of Suffolk. Leriche, M. 1907.5. 



Amiopsis, from — Black Hills of South 

 Dakota. Eastman, C. R. 1900.3. — Cre- 

 taceous of Croatia. Kner, R. 1863.3. 



Family PachycormidsB 



Lias through Cretaceous 

 Taxonomy. — Of forms from. Jurassic 



of France. Sauvage, H. E. 1898.1. — 



Characteristics of the genera. Wagner, 



J. A. 1860.5. 

 Protosphyraena (Erisichthe). — 



Structure, taxonomy and affinities. Cope, 



E. D. {General account) 1877.5; Felix, 



J. P. 1890.1; Hay, O. P. 1902.3, 1903.2; 



Quaas, A. 1902.1; Steward, A. S. 1898.1; 



Woodward, A. S. 1894.7. 



OccMrrence in Cretaceous. — Kansas 



Niobrara. Cope, E. D. 1872.5. — Italy. 



Mariani, E. 1902.1. — Lincolnshire. 



Woodward, A. S. 1912.3. —Belgium. 



DoUo, L. Add. 1893.1. 



Family Aspidorhynchidse 



Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous 

 Evolution. Woodward, A. S. 1890.12. 

 Aspidorhynchus. Structure and rela- 

 tionships. Assmann, P. 1906.1. — ■ Relation 

 to Lepidosteus. Reis, O. M. Add. 1888.1. 



Family Lepidosteidse 



Classification. Hay, O. P. 1898.1. — In 

 Keuper of Upper Silesia. Michael, R. 

 1894.1. 



Lepidosteus {Gar-pike). Natural his- 

 tory, including distribution. Coffin, C. E. 

 1874.1; Cope, E. D. 1865.3, 1870.4- 

 Dunbar, G. P. 1882.1; K., S. 1877.1. — 

 Occurrence in prehistoric times {Stone Age) . 

 Abbott, C.C. 1872.3. 



Relationships. — Relationship of Lepi- 

 dosteus to Aspidorhynchus and Belonosto- 

 mus. Reis, M. Add. 1888.1. — Lepidosteus 

 sinensis; present status. Wagner, G 

 1912.1. 



Fossil forms. Agassiz, J. L. 1848.3, 

 1850.7. — In Miocene of Germany. 

 Andreae, A. 1893.1, 1894.1. —In Oligo- 

 cene of Saskatchewan. Lambe, L. M. 

 1908.1. — In Tertiary of Wyoming. 

 Marsh, O. C. 1871.1. -^ In Cretaceous. 

 Osborn, H. F. 1902.1. — In Eocene of 

 N. America. Cookerell, T. D. {Utah) 

 1909.1; Cope, E. D. {Wyoming and New 

 Mexico) 1883.1; Eastman, C. R. {Wyo- 

 ming) 1900.2,. 5. — ■ In Eocene of France. 

 DoUo, L. 1893.3, Add. 1890.1; Gervais, 

 F. L. {Paris Basin) 1874.2; Harting, P. 

 {Paris Basin) 1875.6; Malaquin, A. G. 

 1900.1; Anon. 536. 



SUB-CLASS DIPNOI 



(Dipneusti) Lung-fishes 



For maps showing the distribution of the 

 recent Dipnoi, see Bridge, T. W. 1904.1 

 {p. 512), and Meel;:, A. 1916.1 {p. 57). 



Natural history accounts. Bolau, C. C. 

 1901.1, 1910.1; Brandes, G. 1893.1; 



Dybowskl, W. 1878.1; Ferret, A. 1900.1; 

 Anon. 348, 349, 350. 



Strv^cture and relationships of both recent 

 and fossil forms. -A-Ayers, H. 1885.1, 

 1893.2; •DoUo, L. 1896.2; Miall, L. C. 

 1878.1; Watson, D. M. & Day, H. 

 1916.1. — Affinities with extinct fishes. 

 Crane, A. 1877.1. — Relation to Arthro- 

 dira. Eastman, C. R. 1906.1. — Rela- 

 tionship with Amphibia. Semon, R. W. 

 1901.4; Zaddoch, E. G. 1873.1. 



Fossil forms. — In Permian and Tri- 

 assic, United States. Cope, E. D. 1877.2, 

 1884. 4,. 6. — "Ctenodipterinen" of the 

 Devonian. •Pander, C. H. 1858.1. — 

 Silurian ofOesel I., Russia. Rohon, J. V. 

 1893.1. — MesozoicandCenozoic. Stromer, 

 E. 1910.2. • — Taxonomy. Woodward, 

 A. S. 1889.2. 



Family Ctenodontidse 



Palseozoic ' 



Ctenodus. Osteology. Barkas, W. J. 

 1877.1, 1878.3,.4; Miall, L. C. 1878.2. 



Relationships — to Ceratodus. Han- 

 cock, A. & Atthey, T. 1871.1. — to fossil 

 Amphibian, Eurythorax. Hussakof, L. 

 1916.1. 



Family Ceratodontidas 

 Ceratodus {fossil genus). Occur- 

 rence in Lower Mesozoic at Maledi, India. 

 Miall, L. C. 1878.3; Oldham, T. 1859.1. 



Occurrence in Cretaceous. Osborn, H. F. 

 1902.1; Haug, E. {Sahara) 1904.1; 



Chapman, F. {New South Wales) Add. 

 1914.1; Cope, E..D. {Montana) Add. 



Occurrence in Jurassic. Knight, W. C. 

 1898.1. — Victoria. Chapman, F. R. 

 1912.1; Woodward, A. S. 1906.5. — 

 Colorado. Marsh, 0. C. 1878.1-1878.3. 



Occurrence in Permian. — Illinois. 

 Cope, E. D. 1875.4. —Bohemia. Fritsch, 

 A. J. 1874.2. 



Occurrence in Post-Pliocene. De Vis. 

 C. W. Add. 1884.1. 



Occurrence in Triassic. — Hungary. 

 Beyrich, H. E. 1850.1. —England. 



