318 EEGTJLID^. 



9. Co. Waterford, 9tli May Seebohm Coll. 



(R. J. U.). 



8. Co. Waterford, 22nd May Seebohm Coll. 



{R. J. U.). 



9. Co. Waterford, 23rd May Seebohm Coll. 



(R. J. v.). 



8. Co. Waterford, June {R. J. U.). Seebohm Coll. 



5. Brajice-peih, Darham {Tristram * Crowley Bequest. 

 Coll.). 



9. Dochfour, Inverueaa, 2nd June Seebohm Coll. 



(Hargitt Coll.). 



8. Norfolk, 25th May (F. NorgaU). Seebohm Coll. 



5. Cambridgeshire. F. Bond, Esq. [P.]. 



2. Bristol, 6th Aug. G. C. Norman, Esq. [P. 



5. New Forest (Zf. )SaMra(fers). Seebohm Coll. 



7. New Forest (H. S.). Seebohm Coll. 



7. Alton, Hants. Crowley Bequest. 



4. Hampstead, London (0. Salvin). Salvin-Godman Coll. 



2. Loughton, Essex (0. S.). Salvin-Godman Coll. 



9. Churt, Surrey. Crowley Bequest. 



10. Tilford, Surrey. Crowley Bequest. 



11. Tilford. Crowley Bequest. 

 7. Tilford. Crowley Bequest. 

 9. Altenkirchen, Prussia, 9th June Seebohm Coll. 



(iSachse). 



Regulus teneriflfsB, Seebohm. 

 (Plate XIV. fig. 10.) 



Eegulus teneriffss, Seebohm, Brit. Birds, i. p. 459 (1883) • Shane 

 ffan^-Z. iv. p. 344 (1908). '^ ' 



Regulus satelles, Koenig, J. f. O. 1890, p. 279, taf. viii. fig. 9 ; Nehrk 

 Kat. Eiersamml. p. 68 (1899). 



The eggs of the Tenerife Goldorest do not appear to differ from 

 those of R. regulus, either in size or coloration. 



7. Tenerife, 27th May. Crowley Bequest. 



Regulus ignicapillus {Brehm). 



Regulus ignicapillus, Thien. Forfpfianz. ges. Vog. tab. xix. flg. 6, a, b 

 (1845-54) ; Hewitson, Eggs of Brit. Birds, i. p. 148, pi. xxxviii. 

 fig. iii (1856) ; Dresser, Birds Fur. ii. p. 459 (1874) ; Seebohm, Brit. 

 Birds, i. p. 458, pi. 11 (1883) ; Gadoio, Cat. Birds B. M. viii. p. 83 

 (1883) ; Seebohm, Eggs of Brit. Birds, p. 209, pi. 53. fig. 11 (1896); 

 Sharpe,Handrl.bi.-$.U'kilQQZ). 



Regulus pyrocephalus, Baedeker, Eier Eur. Vog. tab. 51. fi?. 2 

 (1855-63). 



The eggs of the Fire-crested Wren are of quite the same 

 character as those of B. regulus, but the ground-colour is tinged 

 with pink, and the markings are of a pale lilac-red colour, mingled 

 with lavender or pale brown. There is no appreciable difference in 

 the size of the eggs of the two species. 



