58 aBCKONID^. 



III. Indian Species. — Males coloured like the females, with 

 femoral or prseanal pores. 



A. Digits not dilated. 



1. Hanks without spine-like projecting tubercles. 



a. Males with femoral pores, without prseanal pores. 



Back with uniform keeled granules ; 4 or 5 



pores on each side 9. indicus, p. 64. 



Back with uniform or heterogeneous round 



granules, each with a raised central point 



or short keel ; 4 to 6 pores on each 



side 10. wynadensis, p. 65. 



Back with uniform round granules ; 8 pores 



on each side 11. sisjoarensis, p. 66. 



b. Males without femoral pores, with prseanal pores. 



Back with small smooth granules irregularly 



intermixed with small smooth or slightly * 



keeled tubercles j ventral scales smooth ; 



6 to 9 pores 12. ornatus, p. 66. 



Back with small granules irregularly inter- 

 mixed with slightly larger ones, all with 

 a central raised point or short keel ; 

 ventral scales keeled ; 6 to 8 pores .... 13. marmoratus, p. 67. 



c. Males with prseanal and femoral pores. 



Back with smaU strongly keeled tubercles, 

 and scattered enlarged ones on the 

 flanks ; 2 or 3 prseanal, and on each side 

 3 or 4 femoral pores 14. mysoriensis, p. 68. 



2. Flanks with small spiae-like projecting tubercles. 



Scales under the neck keeled ; tail with 



rings of spine-like tubercles ; 3 or 4 



prseanal, and on each side 3 to 5 femoral 



pores 15. Jcandianus, p. 68. 



Scales under the neck smooth ; tail with 



rings of spine-like tubercles ; 2 to 4 



prseanal, and on each side 3 to 5 femoral 



pores 16. gracilis, p. 70. 



No enlarged tubercles on the back ; no 



rings of spines on the taU. ; no prseanal 



pores ; 5 to 12 femoral pores on each 



side 17. jerdonii, p. 71. 



B. Digits dilated at the base, with 



large plates inferiorly 18. Uttoralis, p. 71. 



