INTRODUCTION. 



OUTLINES or BOTANY, WITH SPECIAL REEERENCB TO 

 LOCAL FLOEAS. 



Chap. I. Definitions and Desoeiptivb Botant. 



1. The principal object of a Flora of a country, is to afford the means of deter- 

 mining (i. e. ascertaining the name of) any plant growing in it, whether for the pur- 

 pose of nlterior study or of intellectual exercise. 



2. With this Tiew, a Flora consists of descriptions of all the wild or native plants 

 contained in the country in question, so drawn up and arranged that the student may 

 identify with the corresponding description any individual specimen which he may 

 gather. 



3. These descriptions should be clewr, concise, accv/raie, and characteristic, so as 

 that each one should be readily adapted to the plant it relates to, and to no other one ; 

 they shouJd be as nearly as possible arranged under natural (184) divisions, so as to 

 facilitate the comparison of each plant with those nearest aUied to it ; and they should 

 be accompanied by an artificial hey or index, by means of which the student may be 

 guided step by step in the observation of such peculiarities or characters in his plant, 

 as may lead him, with the least delay, to the individual description belonging to it. 



4. For descriptions to be clear and readily inteUigible, they should be expressed as 

 much as possible in ordinary well-established language. But, for the purpose of ac- 

 curacy, it is necessary not only to give a more precise technical meaning to many 

 terms used more or less vaguely in common conversation, but also to introduce purely 

 technical names for such parts of plants or forms as are of little importance except 

 to the botanist. In the present chapter it is proposed to define such technical or 

 technically limited terms as are made use of in these Floras. 



5. At the same time mathematical accuracy must not be expected. The forms and 

 appearances assumed by plants and their parts are infinite. Names cannot be invented 

 for aU ; those even that have been proposed are too numerous for ordinary memories. 

 Many are derived from supposed resemblances to well-tnown forms or objects. These 

 resemblances are differently appreciated by different persons, and the same term is not 

 only differently applied by two different botanists, but it frequently happens that the 

 same writer is led on different occasions to give somewhat different meanings to the 

 same word. The botanist's endeavours should always be, on the one hand, to make 

 as near an approach to precision as circumstances will allow, and on the other hand to 

 avoid that prohxity of detaU and overloading with technical terms wliich tends rather 

 to confusion than clearness. In this he wiU be more or less successful. The aptness 

 of a botanical description, like the beauty of" a work of imagination, wiU always vary 

 with the style and genius of the author. 



