I02 MILK AND THE PUBLIC HEALTH ch. v 



one of which was proved to be affected with mastitis. Two persons 

 working in the stable were sick with the same symptoms. 



(4) Lameris and van Harrevelt mention an outbreak of 

 diarrhoea among a number of persons in a hospital. The disease 

 was traced with comparative certainty to the milk of a herd in 

 which several cases of mastitis due to streptococci were found. 

 The infection probably came from the use of milk from a cow 

 that appeared to have recovered, but whose milk still contained 

 streptococci. The milk was used only after being boiled, but the 

 boiling was probably imperfectly done. 



REFERENCES TO ADDENDUM 



Brit. Med. Journ., 1881, i. p. 657. 

 Ibid., 1881, ii. p. 415. 

 Practitioner, 1884, xxxii. p. 467. 

 Glasgow Med. Joiirn., 1894, xxxiv. p. 241. 

 Annual Report Medical Officer of Health, Finchley, 1894. 

 Brit. Med. Journ. 1897, ii. p. 339. 



Annual lleport of Medical Officer of Health,, Surhiton, 1897. 

 Ibid., Hackney, 1900, pp. 60-69. 

 Journ. of Hyg., 1902, ii. p. 150. 

 Lancet, 1902, ii. p. 1050. 



Report of Medical Officer, Local Government Board, 1902-3, p. 190. 

 Ibid. p. 213. 



Brit. Med. Journ., 1903, ii. p. 1492; Journ. of State Medicine, 1904, 

 p. 596. 



602. 



769. 



Brit. Med. Joiorn., 1904, i. 

 Public Health, 1903-4, xvi. 

 Ibid., 1904-5, xvii. p. 773. 

 Ibid., 1905-6, xviii. p. 1. 

 Ibid., 1904-5, xvii. p. 246. 

 Lancet, 1908, June 13, p. 1707. 

 Public Health, 1908, xxii. p. 58. 

 Public Health, 1910, xxiii. p. 181. 



