MBLANIIDE. 293 
var. [? dist. sp.]. 
1 Hangwelle Ella, Badulla ; coll. F. Layard, Esq. 
Probably quite a distinct species. 
var. levis. 
Paludomus levis, Layard, Ann. Mag. 1855, long. 11, diam. 7 lines, “ same 
Locality as P. chilinoides”’ ; Conch.-Cab. IT, pl. 7, fig. 1 [bene], not 
Con, Indica, pl. 108, fig. 3. 
7 Ceylon ; coll. H. Nevill, Esq. [sent as “ P. levis, Lay.’ ]. 
A very distinct and well-marked form, perhaps specifically 
separable. Much more divergent from typical specimens than 
any of the forms so well represented by Mr. H. F. Blanford, 1. c. 
It is a quite distinct form from that figured in the Con. Indica, 
as recorded further on. 
15. Paludomus fulgurata. 
Paludomus fulguratus, Dohrn, P. Zool, S. 1857, Ceylon; Con. Indica, 
pl. 123, fig. 1; P. chilinoides, var., Brot, Conch.-Cab. II, pl. 6, 
jig. 11 ; =P. phasianinus, Reeve, P, Z. S. 1852, ‘ Seychelles.” 
1 Ceylon ; coll. H, Nevill, Esq. [labelled “ very rare ”]. 
Quite distinct from the preceding species, as well shown by 
the figures iu Con. Indica. Hanley’s fig. 62, Conch. Misc., 
as P. phasianinus, Rv., is almost certainly the same sp. There 
can, in my opinion, ke no doubt of Reeve’s error as to the 
locality ; it most certainly never came from the Seychelles. 
16. Paludomus constricta. 
Paludomus constrictus, Reeve, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1852, Ceylon, “ coll. Layard”; 
Con. Indica, pl. 126, fig. 1 ; P. chilinoides var., Brot, Conch.-Cab. II, 
pl. 6, fig. 13. 
4 Ceylon; coll. H. Nevill, Esq. [sent as “ P. tumida, nov.” ]. 
6 Ceylon; ex c. Dr. F. Stoliczka [coll. H. Nevill, Esq.]. 
The above-quoted fig. in the Conch.-Cab. is, as noted by M. 
Brot, not characteristic. The last whorl is as often ornamented 
with rows of small dots as it is without them ; the painting 
is, however, of a different character from that of P. chilinoides. 
