90 



THE STJltrCTURE OF FLOWERS. 



Naudin, Ph. Van Tieghem, and, I think, English botanists in 

 general.* 



There are three methods of investigation, ■which conjointly 

 may gnide us to the discoveiy of the real nature of the tube. 

 The first is that of following its development ; the second 

 is teratological, and the third anatomical. 



Morphological Investigations. — In tracing the morpho- 

 logical development of flowers of the Eosacece, where the 

 receptaeular tube is a characteristic feature, one notices how 

 a border, surrounding the domelike termination of the axis 

 which soon produces carpellary papillae, rises upwards and 

 elevates the sepals and the papillae of the petals and stamens. 

 This border ultimately forms the tube ; and the question is, 

 whether it should be regarded as the basal part of the calyx 

 or a development from the axis. 



In the Pomece we find the apocarpous condition of the 

 pistil, characteristic of all the other members of the Bosacece 

 still retained at first ; but in consequence of the growth and 



close proximity of the tube 

 with the carpels, various 

 degrees of adhesion are 

 brought about between 

 them ; thus, in Pyrus (Fig. 

 22, a), the bases only of 

 the carpels are from the 

 first fused into the axis. 

 In Gotoneasier (b) the fusion 



Fig. 22.-<,,rj/™.; 6, ftto.e«,«er (after Payer), g^^g^^^ ^^ ^ ^.^^^^ j^^^j 



on the ovaries. Such " half- inferior " ovaries occur in 

 other genera, as Saxifraga granulata, Gloxinia, etc. From 

 such we pass to completely inferior states, as in Gompositce 



* Bentham and Hooker describe the inferior ovary of the Pomew 

 in the terms, " Calycia tnbna ovario adnatns." 



