Price 3s, 6d. 



ANALYSIsIf FOOD AND DRUGS. 



Ifor practical public Ibealtb Xaborator^ motk. 



By T. H. PEARMAIN and C. G. MOOR, 



Members of the Society of Public Analysts. 



THE ONLY MODERATE-SIZED WORK ON THE SUBJECT EXTANT, 



T>RKSS WOTICKS. 



The Analyst, November, 1895. 

 ' Both Mr. Pearmain and Mr. Moor are favourably known for their careful 

 work on various kinds of food and drugs, and their extensive laboratory ex- 

 perience in these subjects is an ample guarantee that the processes they 

 describe are in general trustworthy and of a practical kind. Their information 

 is in most respects well up to date, and many original figures are given.' 



Chemical News, November 15, 1895. 

 ' This little book at once commends itself to our good wishes by its Preface. 

 . . . The analytical procedures here recommended are trustworthy, and 

 indicate that the authors are not compilers, but men of experience.' 



The Hospital, January 4, 1896. 

 ' As at the present time we are not acquainted with any handy work in the 

 Enghsh language which covers this particular ground, we are pleased to 

 welcome its appearance, and congratulate the authors on acoompUshing their 

 work in so convenient and suitable a form.' 



The Chemist and Druggist, November 30, 1895. 



' If we were always to judge a book by its size, this volume would not hold 



high rank, but the small boards enclose a great deal of valuable material, which 



is chiefly the personal experience of the authors. It is the drug section on 



which we speak -with, authority, and we find that on the whole this is well done.' 



The IVIedica! Times and Hospital Gazette, Novembers, 1895. 

 '. . . The authors have introduced a Valuable chapter on the examination 

 of urine, which cannot fail to be useful to the ordinary medical man.' 



The lyiedical Press, December 11, 1895. 

 '. . . To Medical 0£6eers of Health and others who contemplate going up 

 for the D.P.H., we know of no other book so well calculated to aid them in 

 simple and practical laboratory work, and to such we heartily recommend it.' 



The Lancet, April 18, 1896. 

 '. . . The work before us appears to be, so far as we have examined it, an 

 admirable littls digest of the analytical work required at the hands of the 

 pubUc analyst. The processes described have been pronounced reliable by 

 well-known analytical practitioners.' 



LONDON: BAILLI:eEB, TINDALL & COX, 



21 & 22, King William Street, Stkand. 



Edinbdeqh: LIVINGSTONE; THIN. Dublin: FANNIN di CO. 



Glasgow : STENHOUSE. 



