78 BIRDS OF OHIO. 
that this species may be found breeding in some parts of the 
state, no positive record has yet been made to that effect. 
It is likely that the birds arrive from the south about the 
middle of April, tarrying well toward June as the records 
prove. They might-be mistaken for the Bartramian Sand- 
piper when so far away that the extremely long curved bill 
cannot be seen, but otherwise they should be easy of identi- 
fication. 
106. (265.) Numenrus Hupsonicus Lath. 224. 
Hudsonian Curlew. 
Synonyms: Jack Curlew, Short-billed Curlew, American Wim- 
brel. 
Kirtland, Ohio Geol. Surv., 1838, 165, 185. 
Dr. Wheaton gives practically the same records for this 
curlew as for the Long-billed. Records from Defiance 
(Slocum), Erie (Moseley), and Ashtabula (Sim) have 
come to me. This species was regarded as less likely to oc- 
cur than the preceding, by Dr. Wheaton. So far as the re- 
ports received are concerned it would appear to be scattered 
over the state about the same. It is strictly a migrant in the 
state Ur. Wheaton had never seen it in Ohio. 
10%. (266.) NuMeENruS BoREALIS (Forst.). 225. 
Eskimo Curlew. 
Synonyms: Scolopax borealis. 
Esquimaux Curlew, Dough-bird. 
Wheaton, Ohio Agri. Report, 1860, 380, 480. 
Dr. Wheaton’s statement that it isa “Not common spring 
and fall migrant” seems to be pretty largely based upon a 
report from Mr. R. K. Winslow that “it is not rare in the 
vicinity of Cleveland,” without specimens to prove the state- 
ment. Dr. Wheaton records only the capture of a speci- 
men taken near Cincinnati by Mr. Shorten, in September, 
1878, but states that he saw a single bird in a flock of 
Golden Plovers in the vicinity of Columbus. Prof. E. L. 
Moseley reports it-as rare in Erie county as seen by Dr. 
Graffe. The similarity of this and the last species makes 
