Cuap. I.] MONGOOS. 39 
grass; and if this were not at hand, almost any other 
plant that grew near seemed equally acceptable. Hence 
has probably arisen the long list of plants, such as the 
Ophioxylon serpentinum and Ophiorhiza mungos, the 
Aristolochia Indica, the Mimosa octandria, and others, 
each of which has been asserted to be the ichneumon’s 
specific; whilst their multiplicity is demonstrative of 
the non-existence of any one in particular on which the 
animal relies as an antidote. Were there any truth 
in the tale as regards the mongoos, it would be difficult 
to understand why creatures, such as the secretary bird 
and the falcon, and others, which equally destroy serpents, 
should be left defenceless, and the ichneumon alone 
provided with a prophylactic. Besides, were the ich- 
neumon inspired by that courage which would result 
from the consciousness of security, it would be so in- 
different to the bite of the serpent that we might con- 
clude that, both in its approaches and its assault, it 
would be utterly careless as to the precise mode of its 
attack. Such, however, is far from being the case; and 
next to its audacity, nothing can be more surprising 
than the adroitness with which it escapes the spring of 
the snake under a due sense of danger, and the cunning 
with which it makes its arrangements to leap upon the 
back and fasten its teeth in the head of the cobra. It 
is this display of instinctive ingenuity that Lucan! 
celebrates where he paints the ichneumon diverting the 
attention of the asp, by the motion of his bushy tail, 
and then seizing it in the midst of its confusion : — 
« Aspidas ut Pharias cauda solertior hostis 
Ludit, et iratas incerté provocat umbré: 
1 The passage in Lucan is aver- lated by Pliny, lib. viii. ch. 53; 
sification of the same narrative re- and AMlian, lib, ili. ch, 22. 
D4 
