426 



APPENDIX D. 



STATES. 



Wool. 



1S60. 



1800. 



Sheep. 



1860. 



Alabama, 



Arkansas, ..— » 



California, .. 



Connecticut, 



Delaware, 



I'lorida, 



Georgia, 



Illinois, ._.■ 



Indiana, 



Iowa, 



Kansas, 



Kentucky, 



Louisiana, 



Maine, 



Maryland, 



Massachusetts, 



Michigan, 



Minnesota, 



Mississippi, 



Missouri, 



New Hampshire,.. 



New Jersey, 



New York, 



North Carolina,... 



Ohio, 



Oregon, 



Pennsylvania, . 



Rhode Island, 



South Carolina, . . 



Tennessee,,. 



Texas, 



Termont, 



"Virginia, 



Wisconsin,. .MM... 



Total States, . 



TEERITOKIES. 



Columbia, District of.. 



Dakota, „_. 



Nebraska, 



New Mexico, 



Utah, 



Washington, 



Total Territories, 

 Aggregate, 



JPounds, 



667,118 



182,695 



5,620 



497,464 



67,768 



23,247 



990,019 



2,160,113 



2,610,287 



373,898 



2,297,433 



109,897 

 1,364,034 



477,438 



685,136 



2,043,283 



85 



659,619 

 1,627,164 

 1,108,476 



376,396 

 10,071,301 



970,738 



10,196,371 



29,686 



4,481,670 



129,692 



487,233 

 1,364,378 



131,917 

 3,400,717 

 2,860,766 



253,963 



52,474,311 



526 



59,932,328 



100 



32,901 

 9,222 



3,312 

 479,245 

 76,638 

 20,720 



42,648 



679,016 



62,516,959 



60,511,343 



62 



52 



142,110 



4,325 



212 



1,506,810 



I give these figures for what they are worth. It will be seen that the 

 number of slieep reported in 1860 bears no correspondence whatever 

 with the product of wool the same year. It assuredly required qyer 

 twelve millions of sheep, taken as they average, to produce sixty 

 million pounds of wool ; and then the lambs of the year, not sheared, 

 would at least equal six millions more. I have no doubt there were 

 twenty millions of sheep in the United States in 1860, and probably the 

 present numbe/equals twenty-flve millions. 



