512 Bulletin American Museum of Natural History. [Vol. XXXVI, 



specimens suggests that of the plate of T. minlosi Berl.,' of Bucaramanga, 

 but the underparts of the figured specimen are more richly washed with 

 rufous than in the average specimen of leucotis. 



Algodonal, 1; Puerto Berrio, 2; Malena, 2; Honda, 2; Chicoral, 2. 



(3390a) Thryophilus galbraithi galbraithi (Lawr.). 



Thryoihorus galbraithii Lawk., Ann. Lye. N. H. N. Y., VII, 1861, p. 320 (Lion 

 Hill, Panama; type examined). 



A specimen from the Rio Salaqui is somewhat less rufescent than any of 

 four topotypes, but it can be matched by specimens from El Real, eastern 

 Panama, whence we have also typical specimens. 



Rio Salaqui, 1. 



(3392) Thryophilus albipectus bogotensis Hellm. 



Thryophilus hogotensis Hellm., Verz. Zool.-bot. Gas. Wien, LI, 1901, p. 774 

 (Bogota). 



Four specimens from Villavicencio apparently represent this form which 

 was found only at the eastern base of the Eastern Andes. From four 

 Guiana specimens of true albipectus they differ in being somewhat more 

 richly colored, particularly below, but mainly through the blackish, rather 

 than the brownish borders to the feathers of the superciliary and auricular 

 and malar regions. Specimens from the Caura River, Venezuela, appear to 

 be intermediate between those from Guiana and Villavicencio. 



Villavicencio, 4. 



(3398a) Thryophilus rufalbus cumanensis Chapm. 



Thryophilus rufalbus cumanensis Chapm., Auk, XIV, 1897, p. 367 (Cumanacoa, 

 Venezuela). Not Troglodytes cumanensis Licht., Nomenol. Av., 1854 — nomen 

 nudum (cf. also Cabanis J. f. O., 1860, p. 408 and Ridgw., Bull. U. S. N. M., 50, III, 

 1904, p. 623). 



Found by us only at Villavicencio at the eastern base of the Eastern 

 Andes. 



In discussing the status of four wrens from Cumanafoa, Ven. (Auk, 

 /. c.) I came to the conclusion that they were not separable from Panama 

 specimens of T. r. castanotvs Ridgw., and I accepted for them the name 

 cwnanensis Licht., the type of which was later said by Cabanis to have come 

 from Carthagena, Col. With a now much larger series of specimens (thirty- 



1 J. f . 0., 1884, pi. 1. 



