448 ADDITIONS, CORRECTIONS, ETC. 
Page 67, 1. 10, for 302 read 303. 
>» 68,1. 14, for 177 read 197. 
69, 1. 30, for robertianum read Robertianum. 
73, 1. 22, for 9. 328 read 11. 329. 
74, 1. 31, for 15. 330 read 16. 331. 
82, 1. 41, for 378 read 368. 
» 84,1. 7, for 375 read 377. 
» 87,1. 37, ‘orobus’ ete. should come at end of line 38. 
89, 1. 20, V. Bobartii is figured in Syme, vol. iii. no. 394, add 
1. Stour. Tadmarton. 
91, 1. 30, for ‘cerasus’ read ‘ Cerasus.’ 
92,1. 32, for fructicans read fruticans. 
93, 1. 2, for ulmaria read Ulmaria; 1. 11, for filipendula read 
Filipendula; 1. 12, after iii. insert—416; 1. 42, for 168 read 
160. 
94, Since I wrote the account of the Fruticose Rubi, Mr. J. G. 
Baker has published a very valuable paper in the Journ. Bot., 
Jan., Feb., Mar., 1886, on the British Rubi and their relation to 
the Continental types. The results of his investigations show 
that the British plants :—plicatus, rhamnitfolius, villicaulis, mac- 
rophyllus, Sprengelit, leucostachys (vestitus), infestus, Radula, 
Koehleri, hystrix, rosaceus, hirtus, Bellardi are identical with 
the German Types. But that in Britain we have been using the 
names of the Rubi Germanict in a wrong sense for affinis, cordi- 
Solius, carpinifolius, discolor, Grabowskit, thyrsoideus, Lejeuntt, 
foliosus, rudis, fuscoater, scaber, pallidus, Gunthert, humifusus. 
1. 28, for now read non. 
95, The variety cordifolius of R. rhamnifolius is identical, Mr. 
Baker says, with R. Maasti, Focke. The original cordifolius Dr. 
Focke looks upon as a rare endemic German type ; 1. 15,R.discolor 
of Bab. is not the plant so named in Rubi Germ. Our British 
plant is R. ulmifolius, Schott; 1. 21, B. thyrsoideus, W. This 
again does not agree with German types. Dr. Focke refers our 
plant to R. pubescens, W. and N., see Rubi Germ. t. 16. 
96, R. carpinifolius, WV. and N. does not agree with Continental 
types, our plant may be R. montanus, Wirt.; 1. 28, Mr. J.G. 
Baker would give subspecific rank to R. wmbrosus, Arrh., and 
place it between macrophyllus and rhamntfolius, and to R. cal- 
vatus he would give the same grade and place it between villi- 
caulis and rhamnifolius. 
97,1. 1, Mr. Baker would give the preference to Bloxam’s name 
of RB. mucronatus ; 1.13. this is not the German Rubi scaber, 
but according to Mr. Baker, R. Babingtonii, Salt.; 1. 19, the 
English rudis widely differs from the German type. Our plant 
which is closely allied to Radula is probably R. echinatus, Lindl. ; 
1. 35, for radula read Radula. 
98, 1. 21, our pallidus is possibly shade grown Koehleri, it is allied 
to apricus, Wimm; 1. 40, our fusco-ater does not agree with 
German type. It may be the R. badius, Focke. 
99.1. 3, our BR. Guntheri is identical with R. saltwum, Focke. It 
should be called by the earlier name of R. flexuosus, Mull. and 
Lefev.; 1. 11. BR. glandulosus, Bell, is probably identical with 
R. Bellardi, W. and N. 
101, 1. 3, enclose the account of Comarum in brackets as there is no 
” 
” 
