198 ANALYSES OF ROCKS AND MINERALS, 1880-1908. 
C. Supposed marl, large surface deposit near Wakeeney, Trego County. Analysis 
by F. W. Clarke, record No. 212. , 
D. Limestone, SE. } sec. 13, T. 285, R.128.E. Analysis by G. Steiger, record 
No. 2295. 
Insoluble 
MICHIGAN, WISCONSIN, MINNESOTA, CANADA. 
Most of the rocks considered under this heading were described by Irving and Van 
Hise in Mon. XIX, pages 131 and 191. A few other analyses, also representing Van 
Hise’s collections, are taken from the laboratory records. The Canadian rocks are 
from near the boundary line, and relate directly to others gathered upon the Minne- 
sota side. 
A. Dolomite, near Sunday Lake, Gogebic district, Michigan. Analysis by W. F. 
Hillebrand, record No. 767. 
B. Dolomite, Penokee region, Wisconsin, NW. } sec. 22,T.44N.,R.5 W. Analysis 
by Hillebrand, record No: 768. 
C. Limestone, bed of Slate Creek, Huron Bay slate quarries, Michigan. Analysis 
by T. M. Chatard, record No. 894. From laboratory records; not in the monograph 
cited. 
D. Limestone, east end of Ogiskemannissi Lake; Minnesota. Analysis by Chatard, 
record No. 899. Not in monograph. 
> 
oe 
fo) 
i=} 
a 
eS 
Lees, a, ot 
SERsrsrs 
1.02 
E. Iron carbonate, SE. 4 sec. 20, T. 47 N., R. 48 W., Michigan. 
F. Iron carbonate, south side of Sunday Lake, Michigan. 
G. Iron carbonate, Palms mine, Gogebic district, Michigan. 
Analyses E, F, and G by W. F. Hillebrand, record Nos. 769, 770, 771. 
H. Iron carbonate, Miner & Wells option, sec. 13, T. 47 N., R. 46 W., Michigan. 
Analysis by T. M. Chatard, record No. 893. 
