54 



DATA FOR MILK INSPECTION. 



State, City, etc. 



Pennsylvania, 1885, . . 



New York, 1884, . . . 



New Jersey, 1882, . . . 



Massachusetts, 1886, . . . 



Minnesota, 1889 



Columbus, Ohio, .... 

 ^Baltimore, Md. , . , . . 

 Denver, Col., ... 

 Xansing, Mich., .... 

 Madison, Wis., .... 

 Burlington, Vt., .... 

 Des Moines, Iowa, . . . 

 Portland, Oregon, . . . 

 ■Omaha, Nebraska, . . . 

 XJ. S. Treasury Department, 

 Philadelphia, 1890, Ordinance, 

 .Society of Public Analysts of 

 England, .... 



by Weights of Solids. 



9-50 

 8.50 



8.50 



:?^^y&|i2.oo 



June J 



3-50 I 



3-1251 



300 

 3.00 

 3-50 

 3-So 



3.00 

 3-50 

 3-50 



3.00 



13.00 

 12.50 

 12.00 

 12.00 

 12.50 



12.50 



13-13 

 12.00 

 12.00 

 13.00 

 12.00 



11.50 



SANITARY RELATIONS. 



Although questions of the food value and the whole- 

 someness of milk are scarcely germain to this work, yet 

 several practical points of comparatively recent devel- 

 opement are intimately connected with the work of the 

 milk analyst and need some discussion. It is now well 

 recognized that the dairy is an important factor in the 



