78 



GBEAT OOLITE PLANTS. 



■described, several of them being represented by rather crude and 

 inacciu'ate drawings : — 



Bensonia ovata, Buckman. 



Sevenhampton Common. 

 ■CijcadiUs ? 



PI. i. fig. 3. Sevenliampton Common. 

 'Carpolithus conicus, L. & H. 



PI. ii. figs. 5ar-d and/, 6. 



Sevenliampton and Eyeford quarries. 

 Thuytes eup'essiformiSy Steml). 



Sevenhampton and Eyeford quarries. 

 T. expcmsm, Phill. 



PI. i. fig. 6. Sevenliampton. 

 Finites{?) or other Coniferse, two species, 



Sevenhampton Common. 

 ■Calamites (?). 



Sevenhampton and Eyeford. 

 ZUia lanoeolata. Buck. 



PI. ii. fig. 3. Eyeford. 

 Naiadm ottusa, Buck. 



PI. i. fig. 2. Sevenhampton. 

 iV. ovata, Buck. 



PI. ii. fig. 1. Sevenliampton. 

 Noeggerathia (?). 



PI. i. fig. 5. Eyeford. 

 Stric&landia acuminata, Buck. 



PI. ii. fig. 2. Sevenhampton. 

 ■Salicites longifolius, Buck. 



PI. i. fig. 1. Eyeford. 

 Mttcites (?). Two species. 



Eyeford. 

 MuBci ? 



IS, sp. noT. 



= Ctenis latifoUa (Brongn.). 



= Carpolithea conicus, L. & H. 



= Thuites expanms, Sternb. 

 = T. expansus, Sternb. 



I am unable to recognise the specimens 

 so described by Buckman. 



Fodozamites stonesfieldensis, sp. nov. 



Sphenozamitea Belli, sp. nov. 

 ; Bodozamitea stonesfieldensis, sp. nov. 



Ginkgo digitata (Brongn.). 



Baiera PhilUpai, Nath. 

 : ? Thinnfeldia apecioaa, Ett. 



The specimens so described have not 

 been identified. 



In a paper by Brodie & Buckman ' published in the Journal of 

 the Geological Society in 1845, the Stonesfield plants are briefly 

 noticed. The variable character of the Stonesfield series is 

 ■emphasised by Hull^ in the Survey memoir on the country near 

 Cheltenham. Horton,' -writing on the geology of the Stonesfield 

 Slate in 1860, suggested that the rock may have been deposited in 

 a lagoon bordered by marshes. 



' Brodie & Buckman (46), p. 223. 

 2 Hull (67). 

 s Horton (60). 



