1 02 BAIEKi. 



In an article by an anonymous writer (Buckman) in the 

 Oeologist of 1863, a drawing by Mrs. Strickland is given of 

 a leaf from Sevenhampton, said to be identical with StricUandia 

 acuminata;^ but this specimen (now in the Sedgwick Museum, 

 Cambridge) has broader lobes and is probably specifically identical 

 with the leaf shown in PI. XI. Fig. 3, which I have named Ginlcg» 

 digitata. 



V. 3433. PI. IX. Eig. 2. 



Probably the original of Buckman's figure of StricUandia 

 acuminata {Geol. Cheltenham, pi. ii. fig. 2). An obscure impression 

 on sandstone, showing part of a petiole and two spreading linear 

 lobes of a lamina traversed by several indistinct veins. Brodie Coll. 



Fig. 10.— iai«ra FAillipsi, Nath. V. 3422. Kat. size. 



V. 3422. Text-fig. 10. 



An obscure impression similar to that represented in PI. IX. 

 Fig. 2, but showing more segments. Compare fig. 4, pl. ix., 

 Jurassic Flora, vol. i. ; there can be little doubt as to the identity 

 of the Yorkshire Coast species, Baiera Phillipsi, Nath., with the 

 imperfect specimen from Stonesfield. Brodie ColL 



' Buckman (63), pl. xx. 



