4, CRUCIFERS. 483 
Cardamine (hirsuta) ev-hirsuta, Syme, E. B. 3. 
Provinces all? Cornwall to Shetland, by the records. 
Syn. 86. Cyb. i.188. iii. 817. My herbarium specimens of this 
are from provinces 13891013815. See the next. 
Cardamine (hirsuta) sylvatica, Link. 
Provinces all? Devon to Hebrides by the records. 
Syn. 86. Cyb.i. 180. iii. 818. Much confusion has occurred 
between the localities for the two segregates of C. hirsuta; and 
dissimilar as they may seem in their extreme forms, some of the 
examples are so intermediate that they can hardly be assigned 
with confidence to either one specially. My herbarium specimens 
here positively assigned to the sylvatica are from provinces 1 2 3 5 
811121516. Occasionally, this segregate has been mistaken 
for C. impatiens. 
Cardamine bellidifolia, Linn. 
Provinces 1-5 -7-10. “Scotland; With. Herb.” 
Error. Cyb.i. 140. Misnomers of Arabis stricta or hirsuta and 
Cochlearia alpina ; Eng. bot. edit. 3. 
Arabis (ciliata) hispida, Bab. Man. E. B. 3. 
Province - 6. Lidstep, Pembroke; Bab. Man. ed. 6. 
Syn. 92. Dr. Boswell Syme adds, “‘ And probably in other places 
in the West of England, but overlooked on account of its resem- 
blance to A. sagittata”; Eng. bot.i.167. George Don reported 
Arabis ciliata as found in Forfarshire; see Gardiner’s Flora of 
that county. In the ‘Manual’ this is placed as a variety of the 
Trish Arabis ciliata, usually so named. In ‘ English Botany’ this 
latter is made a sub-species of Arabis hirsuta; the other sub- 
species being A. sagittata, DC., which is the usual plant of Britain, 
known under our more familiar specific name of hirsuta. 
Arabis Turrita, Linn. 
Provinces- 845-15. Kent. Oxf. Camb. Warw. Kinross. 
Alien. Cyb. i. 148. On old walls rarely. (The Arabis alpina has 
been established many years, clinging in quantity on the outside 
of a high garden wall, in Walton-on-Thames.) 
Barbarea arcuata, Reich. 
Provinces ?23845-7891011---15. All erroneous? 
Ambiguity. Cyb.i.145. iii. $83. “I believe the English ‘ Bar- 
barea arcuata’ a mere variety of B. vulgaris, whatever the foreign 
one, which differs a little, may be”; W. Borrer, in letter of October, 
1850. This opinion is so far borne out by comparing Mr. Borrer’s 
garden plant with the wild examples sent to me labelled as 
arcuata from Worcester, Warwick, York, and Cheviotland; the 
wild examples being different, and apparently vulgaris. 
