57. PINGUICULACEM.— 58, PRIMULACER. 549 
(Echium violaceum has occurred in Surrey, introduced among corn 
for a Distillery; see Journal of Botany, iv. 150.) 
57. PINGUICULACES. 
Pinguicula longicornis, Edinb. cat. 1841. 
Province - 12. Phytologist i. 810. Botanical Gazette ii. 9. 
Error. Cyb. ii. 287. iti. 488. A form of P. vulgaris. 
Utricularia (vulgaris) neglecta, Lehm. 
Provinces - 2 3? 5--8. Dorset to Notts. Elsewhere? 
Syn. 875. Journal of Botany, 1867. Naming by the elongate 
and nearly erect pedicels, examples are preserved in my herbarium 
from Sussex, Surrey, Notts; perhaps also (judging by the smaller 
bladders) from Hants, Suffolk, Norfolk; all of them formerly 
labelled as vulgaris. 
58. PRiMuLACEs. 
Primula (vulgaris) intermedia, L. C.  P. elatior, With. 
Provinces 12345-78-101112131415. [18 Orkney.] 
Hybrid? Cyb. ii. 292. ii. 489. A series of intermediate forms, 
very probably hybrids; some of them closely approximating to 
veris, others to vulgaris. Usually labelled Primula elatior, after 
Withering, until recently, and thus confused with the true 
P. elaiior of Jacquin. In English Botany it is named “ officinali- 
vulgaris ” by Dr. Boswell Syme. 
Primula (scotica) acaulis, L. C. ed. 6. 
Province - 17. North-west Sutherland! 
Syn. 882. This is a variety of P. scotica, differing from the usual 
form by having the umbel sessile, so that the elongated pedicels 
appear to be one-flowered peduncles, as in the common Primrose. 
Thus far, the two forms are in analogy with veris and vulgaris ; 
but there is no corresponding change of character in calyx or 
corolla. 
Cyclamen hederifolium, Willd. C. europeum, Sm. 
Provinces 12384-6-8. Var. ficariifolium formerly in 4. 
Alien. Cyb. ii. 295. iii. 490. A considerable wish would seem 
to have been felt by various botanists to enrol this plant among our 
true natives; even single stray roots of it have been so reported, 
and deceptively swell the number of localities on record in books. 
Sir James Smith gradually changed the original memorandum of 
the Bramfield locality, and for what other purpose it might be 
difficult to find out. I am informed by the Rev. W. W. Newbould 
that the msc. note on the original drawing, made for Eng. Bot. 548, 
is in these words :—‘“‘ D. E. Davy, Esq. from a bank in the parish 
of Bramfield in a situation that gives no reason to suppose it has 
crept (at least lately) in there from any garden, it being 200 or 300 
yards from any house.” Surely, it is no uncommon thing for 
