— 505 — 
Seward, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., vol. iv, pt. 1, 1903, p. 77, pl 
x, fig. 3,4, pl. xiii, fig. 1; Seward. Quart. Jour, Geol, Soc. 
vol. liii 1897, pl. xxi, fig. 2, 3; Seward, 2nd Rept. Geol. 
Surv. Natal., 1904, p. 99, pl. iv, fig. 2. 
1869. Glossopteris indica (Brongn.) Schimper, Traité, vol. 
i, p, 645 ; Féeistmantel, Fl, Gondwana Syst., vol. iii, pt 2, 1880. 
p. 101, pl. xxivA, pl. xxvA, fig. 1—8, pl. xxviA, fig. 3, pl. 
xxviiA, fig. 3, 5, pl. xxxvA, fig. 4, pl. xxxviiiA, fig. 4 ; Feist. 
mantel, Op. cit., vol. iv, pt. 2, 1886, p. 27, pl. xiiA, fig, 2, 
6b, pl. xivA, fig. 7; Zeiller, Bull. Soc. géol. Fr. (3) vol. xxiv, 
1896, pp, 366, 367, figs. 11, 12, pl. xvii, figs. 1—3; Potonié, 
Deutsch Ost-Afrika, vol. vii, p. 496, fig: 22; Zeiller, Pal, Indica, 
n. s., vol. ii, 1902, p. 8, pl. 4, figs. 1—5, pl. ii, figs. 1, 4 
pl. Il, figs. 1—3, Zeiller, Fl. foss, Charb. Tonkin, 1902, p. 84, 
pl. xvi, figs. 2—5, pl. lvi, fig. 1; D. White, Science, n.s., 
vol. xxi, 1905, p.-700; Arber, The Glossopteris Flora, 1905, 
p. 64, figs. 17, 18a. 
1876. Glossopteris communis Feistmantel, Jour. As. Soc. 
Bengal, vol. xlv, pt. 2, p. 375, pl. xxi, f. 5; Feistmantel, FI. 
Gondwana Syst,, vol. iii, pt. 1, 1879, p. 16, pl. xvii, figs. 1, 
2, pl. xxxi, figs. 4,5 pt. 2, 1881, p. 98, pl. xxivA, fpl. xxviA, 
figs, 1, 4, pl. xxviiA, fig. 4, pl. xxixA, figs. 4, 5, 9; pl. 
xxxiiA, fig. 2, pl. xxxvA, fig. 1—3, pl. xxxviA, figs. 1, 2, 
pi. xxxviiA, figs. 3, 4, pl. xxxviiiA, figs. 1, 2, pl. xlA, fig. 
4; Feistmantel, Op., cit., vol. iv, pt. 1, 1882, p. 32. pl. xii, 
fig. 1, pl. xxii, figs. 13, 14, pt. 2, 1886, p. 26, pl. iiA, figs. 1, 
2, pl. xiA, figs- 6, 8, pl. xiiA, fig. 1; Feist- mantel, Mem. Geol. 
Surv. N. S. W., Palaeont., no. 3, 1890, p. 123, pl. xvii, figs. 
2, 6: Oldham, Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xxx, pt. 1, 1897, p. 
45, pl. iii; Shirley, Bull. Geol. Surv. Queensland, no. 18, 1902, 
p. 13. 
The greater part of the specimens representing the genus Glossop- 
teris in our collection are referable to this well known and widely 
distributed species. None of the fragments is very large, yet the 
agreement both in form and in nervation with the illustrations and 
descriptions published under the above name is so complete and satis- 
factory as to leave no doubt concerning the specific identity. In Figs. 5 
and 7, Pl. VI, are shown fragments from the lower part of the leaf that 
are directly comparable with those from the Indian Gondwana, 
5360 53 
