1898— 1902. No.16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W.GREENLAND. 18 
According to Haves’s own Journal and his address to the American 
Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, Dec. 6, 1861, the expedition visited 
the following places enumerated in chronological order: 
Proven . . . . . Danish Greenland Aug. 6—12, 1860 
Upernivik. . 2... — — » 12-16 , 
Tasiusak (Tessiussak) — — ,» 21-92 , 
Cape York . . . . N.W. — 5 20 3 
Cape Alexander . .) — ~- » 30 a 
Littleton Island 2. — _ Sept. 3 . 
Port Foulke. 2. 2. 2.0 — — 4 
” 
After wintering there, the following points were visited the next 
year (besides those only reached in sledging expeditions during the 
winter time): 
Port Foulke. . . . . . . N. W. Grenland until July 14 1861 
Littleton Island . . . . . — — . 5—7 , 
— — Sy lew its dibs 2 = — » 14? , 
Cairn Point. . . 2... ace — - ? ‘i 
Cape Isabella . . . . . . Ellesmereland rs - 
Gale Point. . . . ..., — ? Fe 
Hakluyt Island . . . . . N.W. Greenland 2 . 
Burdin Bay (Netlik) ©. . .  — —  ? (several days, not July 12) 
Itiplik (Ittiblu?) 2. 2. 2. 2. 2 00 = — ? 
Upernivik . . . . . . . Danish — Aug. 14—? 1861 
Augpalartok (Aukpadlartok) . = — ‘ ? ‘4 
Godhavn. ...... — — Sept. 1 e 
At the beginning of September, the expedition was already far to 
the south, and consequently no plants could then be collected in N. W. 
Greenland. There must, therefore, be something wrong about the indi- 
cation “‘Tessiussak, Sept. 4th” but it is probably not the date only. 
Duranp says: Dr. Hayes’s collections have been confined to the limits 
of the 78th and 82nd parallels (Enum. pl. Smith S., p. 93), but no col- 
lections are made north of lat. 79° and Hayes (Op. Pol. Sea, p. 55) 
speaks explicitly of his “Proven and Upernivik collections”, which al- 
ready contained all the plants he saw at ‘“‘Tessiussak”, when he went 
botanizing there (Aug. 1860, see above). Those collections from the more 
southerly parts of Greenland have, in all probability, formed part of the 
material which Duranp has treated as having been collected only north 
of Melville Bay, and thus an explanation may be found for the fact, 
