14 H. G. SIMMONS. |SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM 
hat he has recorded some species not previously known from these 
‘egions. Such are to be found especially among the plants from “Tes- 
siussak” which I have also quite excluded from my lists of occurrence; 
wo species of Durann’s list thus disappear entirely, viz. Campanula 
rotundifolia and Lycopodium annotinum. From Netlik (which was not 
visited July 12th), there are some doubtful statements also, especially 
Alchemilla vulgaris, which I[ have, however, entered with hesitation. 
Some of the Netlik and Port Foulke plants have indeed never been 
ound again there by other collectors, but, as they are found in adja- 
‘ent regions, they may still grow there. Such are “Armeria vulgaris” 
Statice maritima), Betula nana, and Tofieldia palustris. 
Cases in which I have not excluded a species doubtless wrongly 
letermined, but have only altered the name as I have thought right, 
nay be seen in the following, from the special synonymics under each 
species. 
Still there would be a certain interest in knowing where the plants 
rom “Tessiussak, Sept. 4”, are really collected. Now the newer maps 
f the region, the English Admiralty Chart of 1896, as well, as the new 
xreenland map published by Commissionen for Ledelsen av de geolo- 
ogiske og geographiske Undersogelser 1 Gronland, 1906, know no such 
lace in the region north of Melville Bay; but in the map accompa- 
rying Hayes, Arct. boat journ., there is a place so named at the north 
ide of Wolstenholme Sound or in Granville Bay (the map is very 
naccurate). This place might have been visited during the journey north- 
vard in 1860, even if no visit there is mentioned by Hayes, but cer- — 
ainly not in 1861. At all events, such plants as the above-mentioned 
lo not appear there. It is more probable indeed, that the species in 
juestion and some more, may have been collected at the Danish out- 
vost (Udliggersted) of Tasiusak in lat. 73° 21', when Hayes visited it 
n 1860. 
Opposed to this supposition, on the other hand, is the fact mentio- 
ved by Durann, |. c., p. 93, that some plants, among them Lycopodium 
tnnotinum, only recorded from the dubious “‘Tessiussak”, were brought 
1ome in a living state. ‘These cannot have been taken so early as the 
irst year. Most probably they were collected at some of the last points 
hat were visited — Upernivik, with its environs, and Godhavn. Ma.m- 
‘REN, |. c., p. 174, thinks the latter place the most likely to be the one, 
rom which Hayes tried to bring home a living collection of arctic 
ants, and I can only agree with him. The name “Netlik” also is ab- 
ent from the new maps; but in the same place where it occurs in the 
