Index 
Contradiction foundation of 
sound reasoning, 121 
God the ineffable, 1 36 
we must rehabilitate, 151 
——omnuipresent, 265 
Convenient, the common view 
of personality, 31 
——God enduringly, 266 
Converts, protoplasm, things, 128 
Correlation of mental growth, 246 
Creations, we must have, but, 
&c., 36 
Creighton, Dr., on unconscious 
memory, 67, &c. 
Cross, no, no crown, 48 
Culture and vulgarity, 121 
Cunning, we do not mean all, 
&e., 97 
Erasmus Darwin the apostle 
of, 98 , 
——enough obvious, &c., 98 
‘Lamarck apostle of, 98 
and form functionally re- 
lated, 255 
Cuvier, great in small things, 230 
Darwiy, C., and Paley, the first 
denied design, 16, 17 
his weak place, ve rudimen- 
tary organs, 18 
his mantle, 56, 61, 65 
if he had told us what the 
earlier evolutionists said, 59 
heir to discredited truth, 
&c., 61, 243 
stages of opinion on the 
connection between memory 
and heredity, 62 
“‘“Nature by making habit 
hereditary,”” &c., 62 
wanted to differ from his 
grandfather and Lamarck, 63 
and old Moore’s almanac, 63 
———on design in connection with 
Hermann Miiller’s book, 63 
preface to Weismann’s 
book, 64 . 
—tThis was not Mr. Darwin’s 
manner, 64 
271 
Darwin, C., title-page of 
“ Origin of Species,’ 81, &c. 
—essential difference between 
him and his forerunners, 84 
——‘‘through natural  selec- 
tion,” 85 
——and “Hunting oftheSnark,”’ 
gI 
———on the eye, 91 
——cutting out ‘‘ accidental,” 
92, 94 
| ——did not like his accidental 
variations, 93 
——and ‘the unerring skill’’ 
of natural selection, 93 
‘“power represented by 
natural selection,’ 93 
his several editions, 94 
found his natural selection 
a millstone, 95 
admits element of cunning, 
97 
——his real name, 99 
——by supposing his judgment 
warped, &c., 104 
never met H. Spencer's 
fatal objection, 110 
waved Lamarck and E. 
Darwin aside, 130 
——-said sometimes one thing 
and sometimesits opposite, 156 
intended his change of front 
to escape us, 159, 222 
supposed leaning towards 
function in later life, 160 
if he had changed, should 
have said so, 160 
-we should have known him 
as one who was anxious to 
keep us straight, 161 
important, unimportant, 163 
——and “‘experienced natural- 
ists,” 164 
‘imperfect answer,’’ ‘ sat- 
isfactory,” 164 
there must be some other, 
164 
—why he did not say what he 
meant, 166 
