292 
Darwin, C., told Lamarck to go 
away, 166, 212 
——and “ Vestiges,’’ 166, 214 
——cast about for a distinctive 
feature, 166, 167 
——did not acknowledge earlier 
evolutionists till 6000 copies 
of his work had been sold, 166, 
205, 212 
his attitude towards de- 
scent, explains his natural 
selection, 167 
—-— his claim to the theory of 
descent, 168, &c., 177, &c. 
figure of straw re the mistle- 
toe, 172 
naive letter to Heckel, 173 
eo Allen on his youth, 174, 
c. 
treats descent as identical 
with natural selection, 180, 
&c., 185, &c., 196, 197, 199 
——nmysterious, and intelligible, 
190 
his categorical ‘“‘my,’’ 192, 
203 
—on genealogical order of 
nature, 194, 195 
——a large extent of simplicity, 
195 
alters ‘“‘on ”’ to “‘ opposed 
to” and ‘‘ according to,”’ 197 
an interminable number, 
198 
——and by Mr. Wallace, 200 
—ubiquity of his claim, 202 
and Gladstone, 91, 160, 167, 
203, 205 
——-sneaked his ‘‘my’s’”’ out, 
204, &c. 
his meanness, and greatness 
of his services, 207 
‘what he should have said, 
208, 209 
——his distinctive feature, 208, 
&c. 
—ostrich-like and pitiable, 
209 
forthcoming life of, 209, 210 
Luck, or Cunning? 
Darwiy, C., told Lamarck to go 
away, after grossly misrepre- 
senting him, 212 
——neutralised his historical 
sketch, by his book, 213 
—should have said of Buffon 
what he said of Lamarck, 213 
and ‘‘seems,’’ ve Lamarck, 
213 
made all sure behind him, 
214, 215 
and ‘‘ Vestiges of Creation,” 
214 
““ presumes’ re the ‘‘ Ves- 
tiges,’”’ 215 
—suave, but singularly fraud- 
ulent, 215 
misconception about his doc- 
trine and Lamarck’s, 221, 222 
intended us to attach his 
name to the principles of La- 
marck, 222 
his conspicuous sinking of 
self, ostentatious unostenta- 
tiousness, and mastery over 
simplicity, 223 
——like Aristides, 224 
greatest of living men, 224 
——and Herod, 224 
we think we know what he 
was driving at, 229 
cogent while following La- 
marck, 231 
fortuitousness of variations 
kept as dark as possible, 231 
does not know whether his 
variations are produced by 
directly transforming agencies 
or no, 232 
so fogged us, that we did 
not catch his doctrine, 234 . 
“in trying to filch, while 
pretending to amend,” &c.,236 
his own fault, if misunder- 
stood, 236 
——wished us to misunderstand, 
237 
should not be judged by 
letter of his books, 239 
