256 



»t)on between them; and being then, as now, a thoroughfare for vessels 

 passing into and out of the Gulf of St. Lawrence- The union of the 

 two colonies cannot, therefore, be admitted as vesting in 1;he province 

 the right to close a passage which has been freely and indisputably- 

 used by the citizens of the United States since the year 1783. It is 

 impossible, moreover, to conceive how the use on the part of the United 

 States of the yight of passage, common, it is believed, to all nations, 

 can in any manner conflict with the letter or spirit of the existing treaty 

 stipulations.' 



" The questions having been previously forwarded by Lord Falkland 

 to Lord John Russell, Lord Falldand, on the 8th of May, 1841, ad- 

 dressed to Lord John Russel a very able despatch on the general sub- 

 ject of the fisheries, in which previous provincial legislation was satis- 

 factorily vindicated from charges made by Mr. -Stevenson for the seizure, 

 improperly, of American fishing vessels; and clearly showed that the 

 provincial legislation was founded upon and sustained by previous im- 

 perial acts upon the same subject ; and which despatch most completely 

 silenced any further complaints of a like nature. This despatch also 

 refers to the navigation of the Gut of Canso, upon which Lord Falk- 

 land therein remarks, in answer to Mr. Stevenson, 'Her Majesty's ex- 

 clusive property and dominion in the Strait of Canso is deemed main- 

 tainable upon the principles of internatwmal law already referred to, 

 and which it is considered will equally apply, whether the shore on 

 each side form part of the same province, or of difierent provinces be- 

 longing to her Majesty. This strait- isi very narrow, not exceeding, in 

 some parts, one mile in breadth, as may be seen on the admiralty 

 chart; and its navigation is not necessary fo"r communication with the 

 Space beyond, which may be reached by going round the island of 

 Cape Breton.' 



"Lord Falkland again says: 'I have now, I trust, established, that 

 if the interpretation put upon the treaty by the inhabitants of Nova 

 Scotia is an incorrect one, they are sincere in their belief of the justice 

 and interpretation, and most anxious to have it tested by capable, 

 authorities; and further, that if the laws passed by the provincial leg- 

 islature are really of the oppressive nature they are asserted to be by 

 Mr. Stevenson, they were enacted in the belief that the framers of them 

 were doing nothing more than carrying out the views of the home 

 'government as to the mode in which the colonists should protect their 

 own dearest interests. I enclose a copy of the proclamation containing 

 the act of the 6th William IV, of which Mr. Stevenson complains; and 

 any alteration in its provisions, should such be deemed necessary, may 

 be made early in the next session of the provincial Parliament. 



" The opinion of the Queen's advocate and her Majesty's attorney 

 general on the case drawn up by Lord Falkland, and upon the questions 

 submitted by the committee, was enclosed by Lord Stanley to Lord 

 Falkland, accompanied by a despatch dated the 28th of November, 

 1842. The opinion of the law officers of the crown, sustained as it 

 was by the British government, upon the 'point now undet discussion, 

 is as follows : 'By the convention of 1818, it is agreed that American 

 citizens should have the liberty of fishing, in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, 

 'and within certain defined Umits, in common with British subjects, and 



