134 Second Supplement to the Catalogue of [No. 31 



the one from S. India as Indica, ( Enlabus Indicus Cuv.J 

 In Lord Arthur Hay's collection are specimens of each, and 

 he names the Southern one religiosa, the Bengal one Indica, 

 and the Malayan one Javamts, to avoid the inconvenience of 

 a new name, but 1 imagine if any of the three species require 

 a new name it will be that of Southern India, and I would 

 suggest the name of G. minor. 



No. 169. — It is probable that our common weaver bird differs 

 from the E. Philippensis, and Mr. Blyth has suggested for it 

 the name of E. Baya. 



No. 170. — The Brahmincc Baya, which I referred in my 

 Catalogue to E. Bengalensis, being found distinct from that 

 species, both of which are abundant in Bengal, gave it the 

 name of striatus ; but Mr. Strickland has ascertained that it 

 is identical with the species named Many at by Horsfield, 

 whose name will therefore stand. It is also E. jlaciceps of 

 Swain son. 



Nos. 172 and 17-J. — These two species will stand as punc- 

 tularia, and striata, names which, 1 believe, I was the first to 

 point out as prior appellations to those given by Temminck. 



No. 175. — S.cheet (Sykes.) — This little Finch is undoubted- 

 ly the Lozia Malabarica of the older authors, as was pointed 

 out by Mr. Blyth. 



No. 177. — The name JlavicoUis was first given by Tickell, 

 not by Franklin. 



No. 178 — Pijrgiia concolor. — Mr. Blyth considers it possible 

 that the Emberiza olivacca of Tickell may refer to this bird, 

 which I have never again met with. 



* No. 179 bis. — Emberiza icterica Eversm. apud Gray — 

 E. hdeola, Lath., apud Blyth — E. guddak Buch Ham. 



This handsome species of Bunting, which I learn from Mr- 

 Blyth has been figured by Gray, is. I find on reference to Mr. 



