108 BRYOLOGY OF NEW ZEALAND. 
doubt a ey distinct species, and quite possibly is F. Zollingeri — 
Ww wide distribution in Indo-Malaya and Oceania, but it n 
to be aut: in greater quantity before it can be properly placed. 
specimen in Wilson’s herbarium at the British Museum, labelled 
simply “ Fiss. ineurvus, NZ, Col.”’ (2.¢., Colenso), is possibly a different 
— es of Bryoidium from any here included, having wider leaves with a 
touter border and less obscure cells than F. leptocladus 
EXCLUDED SPECIES. 
The “ Handbook of New Zealand Flora ” includes the following Euro- 
pean species: F. bryoides Hedw., F. viridulus Wahl., and F. incurvus 
hwa 1 
Museum. There are no specimens in either named F. bryoides, and this 
must certainly be expunged from the list 
ere are several fragmentary specimens referred to F. viridulus and 
to F. viridulus var. acuminatus (or F. acuminatus H. f. & W., me 
F. acuminatus H. f. & W., W. 318, in ners Wils., is F. campyloneurus 
C. M. & Beck. The Kew specimen appears to contain only F. éenellus. 
“ F. viridulus var., Col., 2135, N. Za.” ” in Herb. Wils., is F. inclinabilis 
M. 
 Fiss. ineurvus, 2139, Col.,” in Herb. Hook., is-F. inclinabilis C. M. 
“ Fiss. incurvus, W. ‘319 9.” is practically the same as W. 318 above 
referred to, containing F. tenellus only. 
ies H., 335c,” in Herb. Wils., is F. leptocladus var. 
Cheesemanii. 
“N.Z., J. D. H., W. 331,” in Herb. Wils., is F. ecient — 
gonion eurus ; ; but with the characters poorly marked as ith 
C. Miiller’s type; the leaves faleate when dry, more sey ‘A singl 
minute erect capsule is present. Several stems, each about 1 cm. long, 
and _ very regularly linear when moist 
iss. nr. incurvus, N. Isld., N. Zz, 1848, Col. Bolton, 23,” in Herb. 
Wils., is also F. leptocladus subspec. gonioneurus, but with the leaves 
P eptodadus longer ; altogether confirming the view of its nearness to 
Cw 319 0 a Per — Wils., is F. campyloneurus C. M. & Beck. 
WN ge Ee with W. 377,” in Herb. Wils., is F. pallidus 
Hook. f. & W. 
CALYMPERACEAE, 
CALYMPERES Sw. 
Calymperes australe Besch. in Ann. Sc. Bae 1895-96, p. 277. 
I have examined the specimen in Besch relle’s herbarium, “Tle Raoul, 
Archip. des iles Kermadec, sur les arbres, Sallé, 1868.” Bescherelle points 
out some slight differences ‘from C. hyophilaceum C. M., which I must confess 
I am not able to ve m his specimens. C. hyophilacewm, however, 
so far as is known, has not a very wide geographical distribution, and there 
is a big gap between ite southerly limit (its area is given by Paris as 
aod’ Borneo, Java, Sumatra) and the present station. I do not 
