THE ORCHID REVIEW. 

 um Wardiantm Foulkki. Card. Chron., 1902, xxxi., p. 125, 



langletensis.— Gartemft ;.;. 1902, p. 113, t. 1496, fig. I, 2. 



Veitchii.— Gartenflora, 1902, p. iij, t. 1496, fig. 3, 4. 



nceps Hollidavana CRAWSHAYANA.— Gard. Chron., 1902, 



fig- 36. 



xxxi., pp. 206, 207, fig. 6b. 



L.elio-cattleya X Choletiana. — Gard. Mag., 1902, p. 214, with fig. 

 L.elio-cattleya X Prince Leopold.— Rev. Hort. Beige, 1902, p. 73, 



Odontoglossum X Adriax.e memoria Victori.e Regin.e.— Journ. 

 Hort., 1902, xliv., p. 357, with fig. Var. Mrs. R. Bexsox.— Card. Chron., 

 1902, xxxi., p. 249, fig. 78 ; Journ. Hort., 1902, xliv., p. 313, with fig. 



Odoxtoglossum crispum Raymond Crawshay.— Gard. Mag., 1902, 

 p. 193, with fig. 



ONCIDIUM VARICOSUM VAR. MOORTEBEEKIEXSE.-~Lz'>uk;mi, t. 767. 



Renanthera matutina, Lindl.— Lindenia, t. 763. 



Vanda Parishii, Rchb. f.— Lindenia, t. 762. 



Vanda Saxderiaxa.— Le Jardin, 1902, p. 103, fig. 52. 



Zygo-colax X Wiganianus superdus.— Journ. Hort., 1902, xliv., 

 p. 313, with fig. 



Erratum.— The reference to " Mrs. Alfred Mostyn " at p. 96 should be 

 corrected to " Mrs. W. Mostyn." 



CORRESPONDENCE. 



R. E. H. Chysis Limminghei and Masdevallia ephippium. The reply was accidentally 

 -overlooked last month. 



G. S. The illustrations in question are not photographic, but only half tone reproduc- 

 tions of drawings, and, while faithfully reproducing the artist's work, will not, unfortunately, 

 .bear minute comparison with the originals. 



W. F. O. Dendrobium Draconis. The Lycaste unavoidably stands over till next month. 



G. B. Oncidium luridum. 



so »pe would be necessary to detect the differences. Why trouble to define them ? 

 \Y. A. Paphiopedilum x Cythera and P. X Leeanum. 



