37 6 THE ORCHID REVIEW. 



ORCHID PORTRAITS. 



BULBOPHYLLUM ERICSSONI.— Gard. ChrOH., ig0 2, XXXii, pp. 383, 384, 



fig. 130. 



Catasetum quadridens, Rolfe.— BoL Mag., t. 7864. 



Cattleya x Magneana.— Lejardin, 1902, P . 32 8, with tab. 



Cymbidium Simonsianum, King and Paktl.— Bot. Mag., t. 7863, 

 Identical with C. Dayanum, Rchb. f. (See O.R. v . p. 356). 



Cypripedium Charlesworthii.— Journ. Hort., 1902, xlv, p. 469, with 

 fig- 



Cypripedium x Transvaal superbum.-^JW. Hort., 1902, xlv, p. 

 445, with fig.; Gard. Chron., 1902, xxxii, p. 361, fig. 123. 



Dendrobium nobile (group at Shipley Hall, Derby).— Gard. Mag., 

 1902, p. 744, with fig. 



L^LIO-CATTLEYA X BLETCHLEYENSIS Fo W LER's VAR.-Joum. Hort, 



1902, xlv, p. 489, with fig. 



Odontoglossum x crispo-Harryanum delicatum.— Journ. Hort., 

 1902, xlv, p. 421, with fig. 

 ^Oncidium x Mantinh superbum.-G^. CW, 1902, xxxii, p. 351, 



CORRESPONDENCE. 



{Correspondents not answered here may find replies to their queries on other pages, and in some 

 de^fleTr^Z 7"' ^ ^"^ ^ ""* ^^^^ ^ ^J^rZit^ t^ 

 J. B C. We do not recognise your Paphiopedilum insigne as a named variety, 

 though the named vaneties are almost endless. It is very pretty, the spots on the sepal 

 being small, and almost confined to the lower half, while the ground colour is distinctly 

 yellow. & 



hardf \ ThG SUPP0S6d hybrld fr ° m LKHa tEnebrOSa X CattI ^ a Bowringiana can 

 ar y e correct ; and the one from Laeho-cattleya x amanda x C. Dowiana aurea 

 scarcely seems properly developed. It would be well to wait until they flower again. 



J. R. The seedling from Paphiopedilum Charlesworthii and P. x Dauthieri Ross- 

 anum ,s good in colour, and very promising, but obviously undeveloped Next season it 

 may show its true character. 



T. T. Cattleya Bowringi 



H. G. A. Rodriguezia decora. 



Photographs received, with thanks. H. A., J. 



