64 THE ORCHID REVIEW. 
Messrs. B. S. Williams and Son, Upper Holloway, staged a good group, 
to which a Silver Banksian Medal was given. It contained good forms of 
Oncidium tigrinum, Lelio-cattleya x Sallieri, Lycaste fulvescens, and 
various Cypripediums, the more noteworthy being C. X Measuresianum, 
C. x Sallieri, C. x S. aureum, C. Spicerianum, C. X Harrisianum 
superbum, C. X Williamsii,C. x Leeanum superbum, C. X discolor, C. x 
Ashburtone Barteti, C. x Fitchianum, C. x nitens, C. xX Pitcherianum 
Williams’ var., C. insigne Wallacei, C. i. Maulei, C. i. albo-violaceum, 
C. i. grandiflorum, and C. i. punctato-violaceum. 
Messrs. Hugh Low and Co., Bush Hill Park, Enfield, showed what 
appeared to be a form of Phaio-calanthe x Sedeni rosea. 
Messrs. F. Sander and Co., St. Albans, showed some well-flowered 
plants of Phalznopsis Stuartiana, a handsome form of Cattleya Trianz, C. 
Percivaliana, Oncidium varicosum Rogersii, Miltonia vexillaria, virginalis, &c. 
ORCHID PORTRAITS. 
ANGRECUM X VEITCHI.—Journ. of Hort., Jan. 19, pp- 48, 49; fig. 10; 
Gard. Chron., Jan. 21, p. 35, fig. 10; Gard. Mag., Jan. 21, pp. 30, 31, with fig. 
CaTTLEYA BowRInGIANa Lapy Wican.—Journ. of Hort., Jan. 12, PP- 24 
25, fig. 5. : - 
CYPRIPEDIUM GODEFROYH LEUCOCHILUM.—Journ. of Hort., Jan. 12, — 
p. 25, fie. 6. ce 
CYPRIPEDIUM INSIGNE HarEFIELD Hatt var.—Gard. Mag., Dec. 3h — 
pp. 864, 865, with fig. aid 
CYPRIPEDIUM X Wotton1.—Journ. of Hort., Jan. 26, p. 61, fig. 12+ : 
EPICATTLEYA X MRs. a O’BRIEN.—Gard. Chron., Jan. 21, p. 37, fig- 1! 
s 
CORRESPONDENCE, &c. 
W.ELR aaality and Stanhopea oculata. x 
ye van poeta a € Nower seems just intermediate between C ripedium x 
Calypso and C. Boxallii, Is it not ; ed ‘ yp ; 
r possibl is no 
trace of C. bellatulum in the flower. ssible that this was the pollen parent? There 
cr Ae F iste Oo Thane, #ab the genet wie 
ene Ip very di ; : 
developed. It should hi aes Bk ni in colour ; the yellow blotches being here norm y 
Photographs received with thanks :—C. C. H.. F. L 
