102 



COPEPODA 



f? and i in yc?, ZI / 7 IQ -04 St. 183 2 par. in f? and yc?, r / 9 1905 St. 167 13 in f? and 2 in y<*, 9/ 5 1905 

 St. 72 15 in f?, and 14 in y^, 2 9/ 8 1905 St. 165 1 in f? and 22 / 5 1904 St. 99 1 parasite in f ?. 



Occurrence. The Ingolf Exp. has not taken any specimens of this species, but it was gathered 

 in several hauls by the Thor. 



In Denmark Strait: 



*9/ 6 1904 St. 152 65°oo L, N. 28°io E. W. Yt. 1000 M. Wire 6 f ?, 1 y? (V), 2 y <? (V). 



800 M. Wire 7 f ?. 



? 15 f?, 3 y? (V), 12 yc? (V). 



? 18 f?, 2f?(V), 10 yc ? (V), 2y?(IV). 



2 % 1904 St. 153 65°20 L. N. 27°i2-5L. W. Yt. 800 M. Wire if?, 4 yd" (V). 

 2I / 6 1904 St. 154 65°2o E. N. 27°io E. W. 2 f?, 2 y? (V), 2 yc? (V). 



In the Atlantic south of Iceland it was gathered at the following stations. 



I0 / 7 1904 St. 180 6i°34 E. N. 19^5 E. W. Yt. 1800 M. Wire if?, 1 yc? (V). 



»/ 7 1904 St. 183 6P30 Iv. N. i7°o8 E. W. Yt. 1800 M. Wire 39 f?, 23 f c?. ioy? (V), 31 yc? (V), 4 y? (IV), 



4 7 c? (IV). 

 2 5/ 5 1904 St. 104 6 2 °47 L- N - i5°03 Iv- W. Yt. 1500 M. Wire 10 f?, 4 f <?, 15 y? (V), 9 yc? (V), 1 y? (IV), 



iyc? (IV). 

 East and south-east of Iceland it was gathered at 2 stations: 



22 / 5 1904 St. 99 65°i5 E. N. 9 °53 E. W. Yt. 1700 M. Wire 3 f ?, iy? (V), 1 y? (IV). 

 I2 / 7 1903 St. 164 62°io E. N. 4°36 E W. if?. 



South-west of the Faeroes outside the Ingolf area the species was taken at the following stations: 



^ 1905 St. 82 5i°oo E N. n°43 E W. Yt. 1200 M. Wire 2 yc? (V); 2 y? (IV), 1 y (III). 



800 M. Wire 1 y? (V). 

 8/ 6 1905 St. 72 57° 5 2 E N. 9 °53 E W. Yt. 1500 M. Wire 80 f?, 5 f c?, 36 y? (V), 83 y c? (V), 7 y? (IV), 



16 y c? (IV), 2 y (III). 

 2 9/ 8 1905 St. 195 6o°oo E N. io°35 E W. Yt. 1500 M. Wire 5 f?, 1 y? (V). 

 7 9 1905 St. 167 57 ° 4 6 E N. 9° 55 E W. Yt. 1500 M. Wire 46 f ?, 12 y? (V), 13 y c? (V), 5 y c? (IV), 4 y (III). 



Distribution and Remarks. I have examined specimens of this species which were determined 

 G. Kruppi Giesbr. by Professor Sars. G. Krnppi Giesbr. differs from my specimens by the much 

 smaller size (?: 3-6— 4 mm.; c?: 37 mm.), and on that account I am not quite sure that they are iden- 

 tical. I have on that account at a earlier date preferred the name G. major Wolf., and this name is 

 printed on Plate III. But as the description of G. Kruppi was published a few months previous to 

 that of G. major (as stated by A. Scott), and as Wolfenden not only in his original description (1903 

 p. 114) says "the lamellar appendage of the posterior foot-jaw is absent", but reiterates the same state- 

 ment as late as 191 1 (p. 231), well aware of the importance of this character, I feel obliged to accept 

 the name G. Kruppi at present. As Wolfenden has identified drawings of specimens from the 

 west coast of Ireland which were submitted to him by Farran as belonging to G. major, and as 

 Farran (1908), about the species which he names G. major Wolf., writes "c7. Kruppi appears to be at 



