iV INTRODUCTION. 
In the adoption of generic and specific names, it has been 
thought right to use, wherever it was possible, that which was 
first applied to the species: as far as regards the specific 
names, there is comparatively little difficulty in the applica- 
tion of this simple rule; but generic names have been used 
by different authors in senses so widely different, and the 
groups which they were meant to designate have been so va- 
riously extended and restricted, that it was no easy matter to 
determine, where several names had been used, which of them 
ought to be preferred. 
If the generic name adopted be different from that first 
employed for the species after the establishment of the Lin- 
nean system of nomenclature, the name under which it was 
first described follows as a synonyme, and where the Insect 
has received more than one specific name, those names are 
also given, as being sufficient for all purposes of identifica- 
tion; and to facilitate this kind of reference, the specific 
names used, will be all referred to in the Index, followed by 
_ an indication of the genus to which they belong. 
These are followed by a reference to a few of the best ori- 
ginal figures of the species. 
In those cases where the two sexes of the same species, or 
any particular individual state or variety belonging to it, have 
been differently named, the name or figure exclusively apper- 
taining to the state or individual is placed after the indication 
of the specimen to which it applies. 
Great care has been taken by Mr. Edward Doubleday in 
the determination of the species, the verification of the syno- 
nymes, and in arranging them into generic groups, in accord- 
ance with the present state of the science. 
It may be observed that the specimens which have been 
