EVERES ARGIADES. 51 



(1869); Kirby, " Syn. Cat.," p. 356 (1871); Staud., " Cat.," 2nd ed., p. 9 (1871); 

 Curo, " Bull. Soc. Ent. Ital.," vi., p. 109 (1874); Scudd., " Hist. Sketch," p. 149 

 (1875); Rossi., " Lep. Wiesb.," p. 29 (1881) ; Elwes, " Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.," 

 p. 887 (1881); Kirby, "Eur. Butts.," p. 53, pi. xiv., fig. 11 (1882); Lang, 

 "Butts. Europe," i., p. 101, pi. xxii., fig. 5 (1884); Kane, "Eur. Butts.," p. 35 

 (1885); Camb., "Entom.," xviii., pp. 249-252(1885); Leech, "Proc. Zool. Soc. 

 Lond.," p. 415 (1887); Auriv., " Nord. Fjar.," p. 15, pi. vi., fig. 1 (1888-1891); 

 Pryer," Rhop. Ninon.," p. 17, pi. iv., figs. 23a-6 (1888); Dale, " Brit. Butts.," 

 p. 53 (1890); de Nicev., "Butts. India," iii., p. 137, inpart, pi. xxvi., fig. 180 (1890); 

 Barr., " Lep. Brit. Isl.," i.,p. 68, pi. x., figs. 2-2& (1893); Leech, "Butts. China," 

 ii., p. 328 (1894): Riihl, " Gross-Sehmett.," pp. 228, 750 (1892-5); Meyr., "Hand- 

 book," etc., p. 345 (1895); Tutt, "Brit. Butts.," p. 185, pi. ii., fig. 5 (1896); 

 "Ent. Record," vii., pp.220, 300(1896); Kirby, "Handbook," etc.. ii., p. 85, 

 pi. xlv., figs. 4-6 (1896); Tutt, "Ent. Rec," ix., p. 254 (1897); Reut., "Ent. 

 Rec," x., p. 97 (1898); Staud., "Cat.," 3rd ed., p. 77 (1901); Lamb., "Pap. 

 Belg.," p. 219 (1902); Wheeler, "Butts. Switz.," p. 44 (1903); Tutt, "Ent. Rec," 

 xviii., p. 131 (1906); South, "Brit. Butts.," p. 156, pi. ciii., figs. 4-7 (1906); 

 Bingham, " Eaun. Ind.," ii., p. 377, in part (1907) ; Tutt, "Ent. Rec," xx., pp. 79, 

 231(1908). Tiresias,Rott.,"Naturf.,"vi.,p.23(1775); Schiff., "Schmett. Wien.," 

 lsted., p. 274 (1775); Esp., " Schmett. Eur.," i., pt. 1, p. 337 (1779); pi. xxxiv. 

 (supp. x.), figs. 1-2 (1777); Bergs., "Nomen.," ii., p. 73, pi. xlv., figs. 1-4 (1779); 

 iii., pp. 11, 34-35, pi. liv., figs. 3-4 (1779); Schneid., " Sys. Besch.," p. 260 (1787); 

 Fab., "Mant. Ins.," ii., p. 70 (1787); Bork., "Sys. Besch.," i., pp. 166, 280 

 (1788); ii., p. 232 (1789); De Yill., " Car. Linn. Ent. Faun. Suec," ii., p. 75 

 (1789); Brahm, "Ins. Kal.," p. 386 (1791); Scriba, "Journal," p. 221 (1791); 

 Bkh., "Rhein. Mag.," p. 292 (1793); Hb., "Eur. Schmett.," pi. lxv., figs. 

 319-21 (1805); Herbst, "Nat. Sys. Ins.," xi., p. 77 (1804); "111. Mag.," iv., 

 p. 66 (1804) ; Oken, "Lehrb.," ii., p. 720 (1815); Godt., " Enc Meth.," ix., pp. 

 659-660 (1819); Bdv., "Eur. Lep. Ind.," p. 11 (1829); Dup., "Pap. Fr.," 

 supp. i., pp.337, 390 (1832); Bdv., "Gen. et Ind. Meth.," p. 10 (1840); Dup., 

 "Cat. Meth.," p. 31 (1844); Doubleday, " List Lep. Brit. Mus.," ii., p. 44 (1847) ; 

 Heydrch., "Lep. Eur. Cat. Meth.," p. 15 (1851); Westd. and Hew., " Gen. Diurn. 

 Lep.," ii., p. 490 (1852); Led., " Verh. zool.-bot. Gesell.," ii., p. 19 (1852); 

 Hein., "Schmett, Deutsch.," i., p. 85 (1859); Staud., "Cat.," 1st ed., p. 4 

 (1861); Kirby, "Man.," p. 99 (1862); Berce, "Faun. Fran.," p. 133 (1867); 

 Snell., "DeViind.," i., p. 61(1867). Amyntas,* Schiff., "Schmett. Wien.," 

 lsted., p. 274 (1775); Fab., "Spec Ins.," ii., p. 133 (1781); Schneid., "Sys. 

 Besch.," p. 260(1785); Fab., " Mant. Ins.," ii., p. 70 (1787); Bkh., " Syst. Besch.," 

 ii., p. 232 (1789); Fab., "Ent. Syst.," iii., pt. 1, p. 285 (1793); Bkh., "Rhein. 

 Mag.," i., p. 292 (1793); Rossi, "Mant.," ii., p. 12(1794); Hb., "Eur. Schmett.," 

 pi. lxv., figs. 322-4 (1799); 111., "Schmett. Wien.," 2nd ed., ii., p. 274 (1801); Hoffman- 

 segg. "111. Mag.," iii., p. 185 (1803); Laspeyres, "111. Mag.," iv., p. 66 (1804); Herbst, 

 "Nat. Sys. Ins.," xi., p. 73 (1804); Hb., "Eur. Schmett.," text p. 51(1805); Ochs., 

 "Die Schmett.," i., pt. 2, p. 59 (1808); Oken, "Lehrb.," ii., p. 720(1815); 

 Hb., "Yerz.," p. 69 (1816-18); Ochs., "Die Schmett.," iv., p. 26 (1816); 

 Latr., "Enc. Meth.," p. 607 (1819); Godt., "Pap. Fr.," i., p. 194, pi. ix., 

 sec fig. 2, ter. fig. 5 (1821); "Enc. Meth.," ix., p. 659 (1819); Bdv., 

 "Eur. Lep. Ind.," p. 11 (1829); Meig., "Eur. Schmett,," ii., p. 13, pi. xliv., 

 figs. 4a-c (1830); Dup., "Pap. Fr.," supp. i., pp. 387, 390 (1832) ; Treits., 

 "Die Schmett.," x., supp. i., pp. 72, 237 (1834); Bdv., "Gen. et Ind. Meth.," 

 p. 10 (1840); H.-Sch., "Sys. Bearb.," L, p. 129 (1843); Evers., " Faun. Volg.- 

 Ural.," p. 56 (1844); Dup., "Cat. Meth.," p. 31 (1844) ; Koll., " Hugel's 

 Kaschmir," p. 421 (1844); Sel.-Long., "Mem. Soc Sc Liege," pt. ii., pp. 3, 

 31 (1845); West, and Hew., "Gen. Diurn. Lep.," ii., p. 490 (1852); Led., 

 "Verh. zool.-bot. Gesell.," ii., p. 19 (1852); Menet., "Cat. Lep. Mus. Petr.," 



* The Papilio amyntas of Poda (Ins. Mas. Graec, p. 79) and Scopoli (Ent. 

 Cam., no. 457) have nothing to do with the present family. The latter author's 

 amyntas has long been recognised as a synonym of Coenonympha arcania, Linn,, 

 and Werneburg argues (Beitr., i., p. 296), with great plausibility, that that of Poda is 

 the same species, and his determination should, perhaps, be accepted, especially as 

 Poda was certainly in touch with Scopoli ; in any case his description shows it 

 must be a near ally thereof. Nor is the Papilio amyntas of Fabricius (Syst. 

 Ent., 1775, p. 533) the present species, although that of the Mant. Ins., p. 70, just 

 as certainly is. 



