MATEEIALS FOK A FLOE A OF FORMOSA. 103 



JPhotinia Lindl. 



Photinia niitakayamensis Hayata sp. nov. 



Photlnia Notoniana Wight et Arn. var. eugenlfolia Koizumi, 

 (non. Hook.) in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XXIII. p. 170. 



Photinia integrifolia Matsum. in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XII. p. 55 ; 

 Matsum. et Hayata Enum. PI. Formos. p. 130, (non. Lindl.) 



Eami fusco-cinerascentes, lenticellis globosis minntis notati, 

 longitudinaliter rugulosi, ramiilis tenuiter tomentosis vel pnbes- 

 centibus Miosis. Folia oblongo-oblanceolata, vel oblanceolata, 

 chartacea, 7J cm. longa, 2J cm. lata, apice acuto-acuminata, breve 

 aristata, vel callcso-aristata basi obtusa vel acuta, intégra supra 

 ad costas et venas tenuiter hirsuta, demum glabrata, costis supra 

 planis vel tenuiter impressis, subtus prominentibus, venis lateralibus 

 utrinque tenuissimis, petiolis 2 J cm. longis teretibus tenuiter 

 hirsutis, basi abrupte dilatatis, stiputeformibus. Flores cymosi, 

 cymis terminalibus 5 cm. longis totiusque latis, hirsutis. Fructus 

 globosi 8 mm. longi, 5-loculares, carpellis hirsutis leviter exsertis, 

 calycis lobis triangularibus 1 mm. longis, totiusque latis hirsutis 

 persistentibus. 



Hab. Ganzan, leg. S. Nagasawa, 1905, Oct. (No. 551). 



The present plant was identified with P. integrifolia Lindl. by 

 Prof. J. Matsumura in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XII. p. 55, and was 

 coiroboiated by myself in Enum. PI. Form. p. 130. It was 

 finally identified with P. Notoniana Wight et Arn. var. eugenifolia 

 Hook. l)y Mr. (1. Koizime in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XXIII. p. 170. 

 Wliilc studying liere at Kcnv, I have examined the types of 

 the species and variety and found that they are not at all 

 in accord with the present plant. They differ from our plant 

 in many points, but especially in having much larger and thicker 



