540 BRITISH LEPIDOPTERA. 



of lakes Goktschai and Sewanga. Kasikoparan, rare, Istissou, Karabagh, Talisch 

 (Romanoff), south-west Caspian dist. — Lenkoran (Radde). Scandinavia : 

 not rare in south, found as far north as Helsingland (Aurivillius), Stockholm, 

 Upsala, Gotheburg, &c., not rare (Wallengren), distributed throughout southern 

 Norway (Siebke), Lapland, more rare than fuciformis —WermeVdnd, Gothland, East 

 Gothland, Scania (Zetterstedt), Saeterstoen (Chapman), HoelTrondhjem,HoelRenebo 

 (Bingham-Newland), Lappmark [teste Bartel). Spain: Andalusia — Granada (Rambur), 

 Barcelona district (Cuni y Martorell), Catalonia (Martorell y Peha), Bilbao, rare 

 (Seebold). Switzerland: This species goes higher up the mountains than H. 

 fuciformis — Zermatt, &c. (Frey), St. Gallen, by no means rare (Taschler), Grisons 

 (Killias), Glarus, to the mountain-region (Heer), Schaffhausen (Trapp), Zurich, 

 especially on the rising ground on the right shore of the lake, not rare (R. Zeller), 

 Bremgarten, often (Boll), Bechburg, rare (Riggenbach-Stehlin), the warm slopes 

 of the Aargau, and the Solothurn Jura, nowhere rare, Lenzburg, Oftringen, Aarau, 

 Kiittigen, Bozberg, Schwarzenegg, Lungern, Villeneuve, Vevey, Martigny 

 (Wullschlegel), Berne (Meisner), G-admen, in the valley and on the Alps to 

 5300 feet elevation (Ratzer), Neuenstadt, rare (Couleru), Geneva (Mus. coll.), 

 between Leuk and Leukerbad (Jaggi), Einsiedeln — Sattelberg (Paul), Weissenburg 

 (Huguenin), Evolena, Villar (Tutt), Tuors Pensch, Bergun, not numerous (Zeller), 

 Geussbach (Jordan), Briinnen (Jones), Zurichberg (Dietrich), Fusio (Chapman). 



ERRATA. 



p. 226, second column, between lines 46 and 47, insert: "ab. minor, 



Tutt," and " ab. rufolinea, Tutt." 

 p. 226, last line, for "apicola" read "franconica." Kirby (Cat., p. 832) 

 makes lateus a Lachneis, and Staudinger (Cat., 3rd ed., p. 119) 

 makes it a var. of Malacosoma franconica. In Brit. Lep., ii., p. 

 498, we have followed Kirby, but in iii., p. 226, we have 

 followed Staudinger. A recent letter from M. Oberthiir 

 makes it clear that both are wrong. He writes (in litt.): 

 " Luteus is a distinct species, intermediate between M. castrensis 

 and M. franconica ; it is nearer the former than the latter. 

 The 2 luteus looks like var. taraxacoides, but is darker (lutea 

 nee cit?'ina) ; the $ M. luteus differs from M. castrensis $ and 

 M. franconica $ , I believe it to be a distinct species and 

 not a variety." I only regret that I had not this note before 

 completing my list in Brit. Lep., vol. iii., p. 226 (Tutt, Ent. 

 Rec, xiv., p. in), 

 p. 227, line 65, for " Me tana stria" read " Amurilla, Auriv." See 



Aurivillius, Ent. Tids., xxii., p. 251. 

 p. 228, first column, line 14, delete " femorata, Men." 

 p. 228, first column, between lines 56 and 57, insert: "ab. obsoleta- 



extrema, Tutt." 

 p. 261, line 22, for " Frisch notices (Soc. Ent., xi., pp. 19, 148)" read 



" Frosch notices (Soc. Ent., ix., no. 19, pp. 148, 149)-" 

 p. 342, first column, line 5, for " Bombyx, Hb." read " Bombyx, Linn." 

 p. 342, second column, between lines 20 and 21, insert: "var. gale ropa, 



Piing." 

 p. 342, second column, line 50, for " Attacus" read " Philosamia." 

 p. 368, line 24, for " Elpeiior" read " CclerioT 

 p. 380, line 45, for " vespertiloidcs" read " vesper tilioides" 

 p. 421, line 38, insert "Westmorland : Clibburn (Hope)." 

 p. 438, line 39, for "on little raised bosses" read "as little raised 

 bosses." 



