364 PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY. 
The following sheets, with ovate leaves more or less glandular and 
with fine appressed pubescence, seem intermediate between this and 
var. virginensis: ARIZONA: near Ft. Verde, 20 June 1883, Rusby, 
(FN); along Bright Angel Trail to Grand Cafion, alt. 1000 m., 10 
Sept. 1901, Leiberg 5926 (N); Hackberry, 24 May 1884, Jones (FN). 
46. . FRUTESCENS Gray var. resinosa Jones in litt., n. var., 
hispido-scabra et plus minusve glandulosa interdum glandulosissima; 
foliis tenuibus margine sinuatis late ovatis. 1-2 cm. longis latisque 
subacutis obtusisve basi truncatis vel rotundatis rare cuneatis utrinque 
plus minusve glandulosis scabris pilis albis basi tuberculatis; petiolis 
glanduloso-scabris 5-7 mm. longis; pedunculis 1-2 dm. longis glandu- 
losis sparse scabris; capitulis 1-2 em. diametro radiatis; involucri 
2-3-seriatis squamis ovato-acuminatis vel lineari-lanceolatis dense 
glandulosis exterioribus interdum paucis pilis hispidis; paleis dense 
glandulosis; acheniis exaristatis. 
Specimens examined: Uran: near Great Salt Lake, Capt. Bishop 
(G); Arizona: without locality, 1869, Palmer (N); Little Colorado 
near Winslow, 10 June 1890, Jones (TYPE COLLECTION, GN); ha 
mile below Tanner’s Crossing, Little Colorado, 18 May 1901, L. F. 
Ward (N). 
4y. E.rruTescens Gray var. virginensis (A. Nels.) Blake, n. comb. 
Leaves broadly ovate, cinereous-scabrous with a fine glandular pubes- 
cence intermixed with stouter tuberculate-based hairs like those 
found in the type; outer involucral scales linear-lanceolate, the inner 
ovate-acuminate; rays apparently always present; otherwise as In 
- the typical form.%® ; 
Encelia virginensis A. Nels. Bot. Gaz. xxxvii. 272 (1904). 
E. frutescens f. virginensis Hall, 1. ce. (1907). 
Specimens examined: Uran: valley of the Virgin River near St. 
George, 1874, Parry 142 (FG); La Verken, alt. 1036 m., May 1894, 
Jones 5195 (FN); southern part, 1875, Johnson (N); Nevapa: “The 
Pockets,” valley of the Virgin River, 30 April 1902, Goodding 666 
(FGN, corypes of E. virginensis); dry washes, Mesquite Well, 1 May 
1905, Goodding 2259 (G); Arizona: northern part, 1872, Wm. 
Thompson 380 (N). 
The following, with white-pubescent but scabrous leaves and more 
or less ovate-acuminate outer scales, seem intermediate between this 
variety and the next; Uran: St. George, 1877, Palmer 238 (G); 
36 Anos to Nelson’s description the lower leaves are opposite, bat} 
have been unable to find evidence of this in the material at hand, and oppost 
leaves are unknown elsewhere in the genus. 
