17 



19. E. stenophylla, Link. 



" 226. E. stenophylla. Pol. linearia basi attenuata obtusiuscula venosa 

 punctata nervisante margiuem connexis. Hab. in Australia. Pol. pet. 1" Igo., 

 lamina 3' lga, 4" lata." (Link's 'Emm. Sort. Berol., ii, 30; DC. Prod, iii, 222.) 

 " Very doubtful." (Bentbam.) 



20. E. tuberculata, Parni. 



"Parni. b. engb. ex Otto horfc. Berol. foliis oppositis sessilibus, amplexi- 

 caulibus oblongo-linearibus acutis membranaceis glabris, raniis filiformibus 

 tuberculatis. In Nova-Hollandia v.s. sine fl." (DC. Prod, iii, 221.) 



" Verv doubtful." (Bentbam.) 



21. E. turbinata, Page. 



By name only in Page's Prodromus. 1818. I cannot trace where, if at all, 

 it was described. 



* 



22. E. undulata, Hort. 



23. E. verrucosa, Hort. Botb ex. G. Don in Loud. Sort. Brit. p. 198 (1830). 



New Holland, 1820. I cannot trace the description, if any. 



21. E. versicolor, Blume. 



" (208.) Eucalyptus versicolor, Bl., foliis sparsis v. sub-oppositis brcviter 

 petiolatis ovato-lanceolatis acuminatis - basi acutiusculis coriaceis glabris 

 penninerviis. Arbor versicolor Bumpb. Herb. Amb., iii, p. 122, tab. 53. 

 Ay -alia Amboinensium. Truncus strictus, altissimus ; cortice tenni, laevigata, 

 albido, in laniellas secedente excellentcm gerens colorem ex rubro luteo et 

 viridi rariegatum, qui e longinquo iridis colorem refert. Polia 5 poll, longa, 

 2 poll, lata, lamina, nervo medio sub t us argute prorninente, sicca supra 

 nigricantia. In Moluccas." (Blume, Mus. Pot. Ludg. Bat., vol. i, 1819, p. 81.) 



Prom tbe Moluccas, taken up from Bumphius' description and rude figure of 

 Arbor versicolor Ay-alla (Serb. Amb., iii, p. 122, t. 80, not t. 53, which is an 

 Eugenia) without flowers or fruit." (Bentbam, Journ. Linn. Soc, x, 143.) 



"44. Eucalyptus, nov. sp. ramulis rubellis, etc., e specimine incompleto 

 non describenda. Van Diemen's Land (Stuart n. 19)." Miq. in Ned. Kruidk. 

 Arch., iv, 141 (1856). 



I have not been able to see a specimen of Stuart's No. 19 from Tasmania, so 

 that I cannot say if it would be possible to express an opinion as to tbe species to 

 which it belongs. 



