189 



2. With E. eoriaeea A. Cunn. 



" The venation somewhat resembles that of E. eoriaeea, but the fruits are different, and csrec'a] ; 

 the buds and bark." (Original description.) 



E. eoriaeea has a close affinity to E. stellulata, so that E. Laseroni has affinity 

 to E. eoriaeea, but far less than to E. stellulata. For E. eoriaeea see Plates 26 and 

 27, Part V. 



3. With E. eapitellata Sm. 



" The fruits fairly well match those of E. eapitellata, but this is the only 

 resemblance to that species amongst Stringybarks." (Original description.) 



The Stringybark in question is E. eugenioides rather than E. eapitellata, as wi]/ 

 be seen from examination of fig. 17, Plate 40, Part VIII. 



4. With E. eugenioides Sieb. 



I have already stated that I looked upon E. Laseroni as a stellulata x eugenioides , 

 which is an expression of opinion that an affinity is to E. eugenioides. The resemblance 

 between E. oblonga DC, see fig. 6 (for Sieber's Fl. Nov. Holl. No. 583, the type), and 

 fig. 7, Plate 40, Part VIII, "White Stringybark" of the Mudgee district, and 

 E. Laseroni is obvious, and most people look upon E. oblonga as synonymous with 

 E. eugenioides. 



5. With E. dives Schauer. 



' The venation (of E. Laseroni) seems to be intermediate between that of the 

 typical Stringybarks and the Peppermint group, but more approaching that of 

 E. dives." (Original description.) 



