Blake — New and Noteworthy Compositae 57 
lati dorso glabri 12mm. longi 3.5-4.5 mm. lati; corollae disci 
flavae glabrae 5.6 mm. longae (tubo 2-2.5 mm., dentibus 0.8 mm.). 
Receptaculum convexum; paleae angustae lineatae apice sub- 
fuscatae lacerato-ciliatae 5mm. longae. Achenia incrassata infra 
angustata subquadrangularia glabra purpureo-nigrescentia 1.8 
mm. longa. Aristae pappi ca. 20 inaequales deciduae sursum 
ciliatae 1.5-2mm. longae, in annulo persistente insidentes. — 
GUATEMALA: a slender shrub up to 5 meters high, in ravines, Que- 
zaltenango, 31 Jan. 1917, E. W. D. Holway 817 (yen in Gray 
Herb.). — Remarkable in its broad thin long-petioled leaves. 
CaLEA UrRTicrFoL1IA (Mill.) DC. Prod. v. 674 (1836), as urticae- 
Jolia. — Solidago urticifolia Mill. Gardn. Dict. ed. 8. no. 30 (1768). 
Caleacte urticifolia (Mill.) R. Br. Trans. Linn. Soc. xii. 109 
(1817). Calea azillaris DC. var. urticaefolia (Mill.) Rob. & 
Greenm. Proc. Am. Acad. xxxii. 27 (1896). — Miller’s Solidago 
urticifolia, based on specimens from Vera Cruz collected by 
Houstoun, is by far the oldest name for this species. The nar- 
row-leaved form, treated as the species by Robinson & Greenman 
in their revision, becomes 
C. urticrroiia (Mill.) DC. var. axillaris (DC.), comb. nov. — 
Mocinna serrata Lag. Nov. Gen. 31 (1816). Galinsogea serrata 
(Lag.) Spreng. Sys. iii. 579 (1826). Calea axillaris DC. Prod. v. 
673 (1836). 
Stenocarpna filiformis (Hemsl.), comb. nov.—Galinsoga filifor- 
mis Hemsl. ! Diagn. Pl. Nov. ii. 34 (1879); Biol. Centr.-Am. Bot. 
li. 204, t. 50 (1881). Galinsoga filipes “ Hemsl.” et Stenocarpha 
jilipes Blake, Kew Bull. 1915. 348 (Sept. 1915). — When establish- 
ing the genus Stenocarpha I unfortunately cited its unique species, 
through some error, as Galinsoga filipes Hemsl. The name as 
by Hemsley was however G. filiformis, and the species 1s prope rly 
designated by the name used above. Two varieties are known: 
var. genuina (G. filiformis Hemsl. 1. c.) and var. epapposa (Rob.), 
comb. nov. (Galinsoga filiformis Hemsl. var. epapposa Rob. ! 
Proc. Am. Acad. xliii. 42 (1907)). As in many similar cases, the 
epappose form differs not only in the lack of pappus but in the 
glabrous achene. As the type collection (Palmer 127 of 1906, 
from Durango) includes both forms, it is probable that they grow 
together, as is likewise true of similar forms in Simsia, at least in 
some cases. 
