TROPICAL AMERICAN EUPATORIEAE 79 
but this appears to be merely a clerical error, since the station men- 
tioned is Salta, a place located in nothern Argentina. No Bolivian 
material of this species has been found in the herbarium of Dr. 
Kuntze which is now at the New York Botanical Garden. 
E. Mandonii Sch.-Bip. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. xii. 81 (1865), name only, 
& Linnaea, xxxiv. 533 (1865-66), where briefly described = E. 
BUPLEURIFOLIUM DC. (see p. 46). 
E. megaphyllum Bak. in Mart. Fl. Bras. vi. pt. 2, 322 (1876); 
Ktze. Rev. Gen. iii. 148 (1898); Rusby, Bull. N. Y. Bot. Gard. iv. 
378 (1907) = E. Mortrotium Mill. (see p. 48). 
E. paucidentatum Sch.-Bip. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. xii. 81 (1865), & 
Linnaea, xxxiv. 535 (1865-66 ) = E. conntvens Rusby (see p. 38). 
E. piptopappum Sch.-Bip. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. xii. 82 (1865), & 
Linnaea, xxxiv. 535 (1865-66), was not described beyond the words 
“involucri folia acuta”? and is therefore a nomen subnudum. Ma- 
terial of E. piptopappum is said to have been distributed under 
Mandon’s no. 259, but to have been mixed with FE. Pentlandianum 
DC. and a variety of Stevia Haenkeana DC. Nothing separable 
from E. Pentlandianum DC. has been found on the available sheets 
of Mandon’s number in question. 
E. nemorense Sch.-Bip. Bull. Soe. Bot. Fr. xii. 91 (1865), & Linnaea, 
xxxiv. 535 (1865-66), without character = E. SANTACRUZENSE 
Hieron. (see p. 51). 
E. piquerioides DC. Prod. v. 175 (1836) = OPHRYOSPORUS PIQUE- 
RIOIDES (DC.) Benth. ex Bak. in Mart. Fl. Bras. vi. pt. 2, 188 (1886) ; 
Robinson, Proc. Am. Acad. xlii, 23 (1906). 
E. pteropodum Hieron. in Engl. Bot. Jahrb. xxix. 15 (1900) = E. 
NEMOROSUM Klatt (see p. 76). 
E. Rusbyi Britton, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, xvii. 374 (1891) = E. 
NEMOROsSUM Klatt (see p. 76). 
E. scabrum Britton, 1. c. 333, not L. f. = E. SQUALIDUM, var. Rus- 
BYANUM Robinson (see p. 41). 
E. scopulorum Sch.-Bip. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. xii. 82 (1865), & Linnaea, 
xxxiv. 535 (1865-66); Rusby, Bull. N. Y. Bot. Gard. iv. 378 (1907); 
not Wedd. = E. topatum Robinson (see p. 63). 
E. sordescens Buchtien, Contrib. Fl. Boliv. 189 (1901), not DC. 
If, as seems probable, this is the plant distributed as Buchtien, no. 
1518 (N. Y.) from San Carlos, alt. 750 m., it is E. Lops Klatt, a 
species which also on previous occasions has been confused with E. 
sordescens DC., a very different plant of Atlantic Brazil, belonging 
to § Eximbricata and having heads about 25-flowered and involucral 
