THE SHAPES OF FLOWERS. 149 



absence of determinate relations between the parts of the 

 flowers and the incident forces ; and hence an absence of 

 bilateralness. This inconstancy of relative position 



is produced in various other ways — by extreme flexibility of 

 the peduncles, as in the Blue-bell ; by the tendency of the 

 peduncles to curl to a greater or less extent in different 

 directions, as in Pyrola ; by special twisting of the peduncles, 

 differing in degree in different individuals, as in Convol- 

 vulus ; by extreme flexibility of the petals, as in Lythrum, 

 Elsewhere the like general result arises from a progressive 

 change of attitude ; as in Myosotis, the stem of which as it 

 enfolds causes each flower to undergo a transition from an 

 upward position of the mouth to a lateral position ; or as in 

 most Crucifercv, where the like effect follows from an altered 

 direction of the peduncle. 



There are, however, certain seemingly anomalous cases 

 where radial sympathy is maintained by laterally-placed 

 flowers, which keep their parts in relative positions that are 

 tolerably constant. The explanation of these exceptions is 

 not manifest. It is only when we take into account certain 

 incident actions liable to be left unremembered, that we find 

 a probable solution. It will be most convenient to postpone 

 the consideration of these cases until we have reached the 

 general rule' to which they are exceptions. 



§ 234. Transitions varying in degree from the radial to- 

 wards the bilateral, are common in flowers that are borne at 

 the ends of branches or axes which are inclined in tolerably 

 constant ways. We may see this in sundry garden flowers 

 such as Petunia, or such as Tydcea and AcJiimenes shown in 

 **3 ^/i Tigs. 232 and 233. If these 

 Xuf\ plants be examined, it will 



o \ be perceived that the mode 

 A i of growth makes the flower 



unfold in a partially one- 

 sided position ; that its parts of attachment have rigidity 



