12 THE ORCHID REVIEW. 
November, 1893 (O. R., I., p. 374), and more recently by M. Jules Hye to 
the cross from C. Spicerianum ¢ and C. x Sallieri Hyeanum 3 (Gard. 
Chron., 1895, i., p. 207). This latter hybrid should return to its original 
name, C. X aureum. 
C. X Cecilia was exhibited by Messrs. Sander & Co., 26th Sept., 1893, 
as raised from C. tonsum @ and C. Spicerianum g (O. R., I., p. 350), 
while another of the same name, but with parentage purpuratum Kimballi- 
anum @ X Spicerianum g appears in E. Bohnhof’s Dictionnaire des 
Orchidees Hybrides (1895), and also in one of Messrs. Charlesworth’s 
Catalogues for the same year. 
Are there two distinct C. x Charles Goudoin’s? The Orchid Review 
(vol. I., p. 154) quotes one from the Orchidophile (November, 1892, p. 337) 
and records the parents as C. x Harrisianum and C. insigne Chantini, 
while Mr. Williams, in his Orchid Growers’ Manual (7th edition, p. 243), gives 
C. Charles Goudoin—*a cross between C. insigne punctatum violaceum 
and C. X vernixium.” Probably they are the same thing, and the record of 
parentage doubtful. 
C. X Claudii, raised by M. Moens (0. R., IL., p- 59), has for its parents 
C. Spicerianum ¢ and C. x vernixium ¢, but C. x Claudi appears 
in Mr. E. Bohnhof’s book as Spicerianum 3 X insigne Wallacei 3. 
There seems to be some confusion between the names C. x delicatum 
and C. X delicatulum. M. Jules Hye appears to have given the former 
name to a Spicerianum hybrid (Gard. Chron., 1894, UL., p. 728), and 
Messrs. Lewis & Co., of Southgate, inform me that their hybrid exhibited 
as C. X delicatum on October r4th, 1895, has for its parents C. Dayanum 
and C. barbatum, Warnerianum. Doubtless this last is identical with 
C. X delicatulum, Rchb. f. 
The name Eurydice seems to have found favour with hybridists, there 
being no less than three Cypripediums so named. First we have C. X 
Eurydice, from C. x Leeanum superbum 3 and hirsutissimum 3, of M. 
Ch. Vuylsteke (O. R., IL., p- 61) then one of Continental origin from C. 
Boxallii @ and Spicerianum 3g (Gard. Chyon., 1895, i., p. 199), and, 
lastly, one from C. Hookere g and C. Spicerianum 3, of American origin 
(Gard. Chron., 1895, i., p. 550). 
With Finetianum it is again a case of C pripedi and Selenipedi 
the former being from C. philippinense @ and ciliolare 3, or the reverse 
cross to C. x Alfred Hollington, the latter from S. x cardinale @ and S. 
caudatum ¢ (O. R., III., P- 102). 
C. X Gibezianum appears as venustum ? X villosum ¢ according to 
Lindenia (t. 425), and as villosum 9 x insigne ¢ in the Gardeners’ 
Chronicle (1895, i., p. 370). Doubtless the same thing, but with parentage 
not strictly recorded. 
